Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary. Now with pictures!
- Rhonda Lea Kirk
May 25, 2006, 11:17 pm
rate this thread
George Orwell wrote:
<snipped juvenile rant>
What's pathetic is that you're compelled to resort to ad hominem attacks
and fallacious analogies to make a argument.
I'm 48 years old, not a criminal, not a delinquent, and not a loser--I'm
just a lurker who finds this argument becoming more obnoxious by the
post. I'm also a career paralegal who never much liked criminal
practice, because the common attitudes held by criminals in general are
repugnant to me. It's very difficult to handle a case for scum,
because...well...scum is scum.
The point of telling you this is so you'll understand why I do not
perceive your target as you do. He does not present as a criminal
personality, so you'll have to figure out some other way to label him.
There's a big difference between "sociopath" and "Type-T."
The way it really seems to me is that you have an ax to grind, and you
have mistaken him for a whetstone.
By my estimation, you lost the entire argument when you resorted to the
tactics used by 12-year old boys, i.e., this is fast turning into a (on
your side) "your mama" argument.
You lose, by definition.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Insisting on perfect safety is for people
without the balls to live in the real world.
Mary Shafer Iliff