MSN Does But Google Don't

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
MSN keeps a Track of which keyword is search and which is the first
site which has been clicked for that keyword, but google donot..

As all of you have seen that when we Search something on google and in
the organic result, we get a direct url for the respective sites,
whereas in MSN we get a Query String link in the result page, the
purpose of this link is to track the keyword on the MSN Server, and
then MSN actually redirects to the destination Page..

And this is really Logical thing and may be MSN using this as one of
this criteria for the ranking sites....

Please give your suggestion

Data Recovery Software & Services - Data
Recovery Software
Recupero di dati - Recupero dati
Datenrettungs software - Datenrettungs

Re: MSN Does But Google Don't

__/ [cordial_camaraderie] on Monday 21 November 2005 06:18 \__

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Assuming I get your point right...

Google  actually do that sort of tracking using re-directs. I imagine that
they  refine  their results in this way, which I find  inconveniencing.  I
sometimes  want to search for something in hope of just getting the URL to
post elsewhere. When I try to copy the link from the results page, I get a
Google  redirect  instead of the actual URL. Consequently, I  must  follow
through  to the site and then grab the address from the address bar of the

Although  Google  display the addresses in their results pages, these  ad-
dresses  are re-formatted to serve as /context/, so they are impartial  or
overly fragmented.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Google  use just a subset for a sufficiently effective sample size. I sup-
pose that Google's query volume enables them to 'bother' only a few users,
whereas MSN, who are trying to catch up, do this consistently.

Like I said before, that tracking mechanism raises concerns such as momen-
tum.  The  more you use the search engine, the more you improve  it.  This
leads  to  a cycle, which makes Google hard to compete against.  Microsoft
are  said to have benefited from similar scenarios in the context of soft-

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Yes,  it's true. It would have been silly to ignore that as an option  for
optimisation. It's autonomous too, in line with machine learning where the
users are merely 'ants' that train the core (indices in this case).


Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector"  |    SuSE Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  7:00am  up 18 days  2:54,  4 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.37, 0.51 - next generation of search paradigms

Site Timeline