Google News SEO?

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
Hi, I was recently asked the question from a Washington Post Editor,
why isn't

I understand all the "Google Search" rules, "it's not indexed cuz it's
in deep subdirectories and it's gotta dynamic URL, the navigation is
deep more than 4 clicks...".

But does anyone know anything about the Google News bot?  I understand
it's a diff both from the normal Googlebot.  Does Google just have a
list of 1000 or so "news sites", and that newsbot consistantly run
through it over and over several times an hour?  And does it have a
diff database from Google Search, as in a specific page on could be indexed by Google Search but not Google
News, or vise-versa?

And does anyone know any "search commands" for Google News? works for Google News, but looking inside a
directory ( doesn't work for some

Any information on anything about Google News is greatly appreciated.


Re: Google News SEO?

__/ [ Paul Zhao ] on Friday 17 March 2006 15:44 \__

Quoted text here. Click to load it
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Ask/tell him something in return. For example:

* I suspect that some content in the Washington Post (not just the NY Times)
requires one to be registered in order to be read. This must be the price
one would pay for trying to alter the way to Web works, often for self
convenience (at the expense of the users and even crawlers who get

* Why is the URL so long? What CMS is used? Why can't the URL not be as
meaningful and yet short /a la/ BBC?

* Bloggers tend to copy entire items from mainstream media. Do a full-text
search of a popular article to see what I mean. It is possible that this
article was excluded due to suspicion of plagiarism (or duplicate content),
which is detected automatically.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

No. Good ranks would allow the spider to crawl deep enough and index the
pages without any reluctance.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Google News aggregate certain sites that are considered to be new sites and
pass some test. If you want to get only news site, Use Yahoo News, which in
my opinion is 'cleaner'. More recently, I even find job offers and shops
among Google News items.

As a side note, I believe that Google News visit sites ans poll for updates
of actual pages rather than rely on XML/RSS feeds. The reasons must be
historical as sites are still in the process of making their content more

Quoted text here. Click to load it

I suggest you use a toolbar to get results from I don't
believe a 'magic' command or reserved keyword exists. Google News, by the
way, is the only content from Google which one can syndicate (apart from the
Google Blog, of course). This has been the case for about 6 months, possibly
initiated in oder to keep up with Yahoo.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

I can offer some of my own (if I may):

         Google News Feeds

         Syndicating News

Hope it helps,


Re: Google News SEO?

Definately helps.
Thanks Roy

Re: Google News SEO?

Quoted text here. Click to load it

It is indexed under -

And is PR7 (suggesting a lot of quality links).

It's got thousands of backlinks (almost 10,000)-,GGLJ:2006-09,GGLJ:en&q=link:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ewashingtonpost%2ecom%2fwp%2ddyn%2fcontent%2flinkset%2f2005%2f05%2f18%2fLI2005051801255%2ehtml

And with the right search-
you can find the page in Google.

The ?nav=topnav bit I removed looks like a move to the top of the page
link (usually find them at the bottom of a page), adding this is
probably what threw you. Google should (and has) treated the two URLs-
as the same page and only indexed one of them. It's good when they get
it right :-))

If your editor friend has any difficult questions feel free to send
him my way, always up for a challenge (the above one was too easy

Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial /

Re: Google News SEO?

I understand that it's indexed in Google, but why hasn't Google News
picked it up?  So far, the only answer I've got that's relavant is
"Because that page isn't 'news' and either are the 'live discussion'
pages linked from it".  Do you guys agree with that?

Site Timeline