|
Posted by tom on November 17, 2006, 8:28 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hello,
I made have sites in Europe where I sell portraits from photographs
made in our studio in Manila. I use a variety of providers to host
these sites.
Many Europeans think that the US is THE market to sell your stuff. I am
one of them.
So I decided to build a new site for"the world except Europe". It is
hosted by a 24 dollar a year provider who does a great job for me in
the Netherlands and the UK.
I made a few pages showing images and like to know how it performs.
If any North American group member would check it, I would be happy.
This is the address:
http://www.portraits-international.com/
Thanks in advance.
Tom Klinkhamer.
|
|
Posted by arccos on November 17, 2006, 8:54 am
Please log in for more thread options
Speed is very fast. I had no problems with performance.
You may want to shrink down your images on the main pages, though. The
bandwidth costs will quickly become expensive.
--
Arccos
http://www.landoflyrics.com - Music, Movie, and Soundtrack Lyrics
|
|
Posted by tom on November 17, 2006, 8:58 am
Please log in for more thread options
arccos wrote:
> Speed is very fast. I had no problems with performance.
>
> You may want to shrink down your images on the main pages, though. The
> bandwidth costs will quickly become expensive.
Thanks Arcos,
If ever i have a bandwidth problem I am happy because it means a lot of
visitors.
Regards,
Tom.
--
|
|
Posted by Matt Probert on November 17, 2006, 9:04 am
Please log in for more thread options
>arccos wrote:
>
>> Speed is very fast. I had no problems with performance.
>>
>> You may want to shrink down your images on the main pages, though. The
>> bandwidth costs will quickly become expensive.
>
>Thanks Arcos,
>If ever i have a bandwidth problem I am happy because it means a lot of
>visitors.
>Regards,
>Tom.
You can always issue http headers to ask ISPs along the chain to cache
images. That way, dozens of visitors from say, Road Runner (if they
use caching, which they probably do), will get faster response, and
you will use less bandwidth.
Matt
--
Woe to him that willfully innovates, while ignorant of the constant.
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com
|
|
Posted by tom on November 17, 2006, 9:10 am
Please log in for more thread options
Thanks for the suggestion Matt,
never thought of that.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Performance Issues for Mozilla Web Site | July 25, 2005, 12:59 pm |
| Browsers for testing your web site in? | October 13, 2006, 2:40 pm |
| Site search script testing | September 9, 2005, 5:45 pm |
| Book about Web Site Measurement and Testing | July 12, 2006, 9:52 pm |
| Book about Web Site Measurement and Testing | July 12, 2006, 9:52 pm |
| Pickup game site seeks beta testing | November 8, 2006, 12:04 am |
| site seems down to some users... | July 6, 2008, 9:32 am |
| Another web site critique request | August 22, 2007, 5:19 am |
| Request to post message about our site | August 20, 2007, 12:50 am |
| Request to post message about our site | August 20, 2007, 3:22 am |
|
XML Sitemap