Click here to get back home

remoted machines with cached domain logons

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 microsoft.public.windows.server.security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
remoted machines with cached domain logons djc 08-30-2006
Posted by djc on August 30, 2006, 8:43 am
Please log in for more thread options
I am setting up a few machines for remote users. In the past I have
generally not made these machines domain members. I set them up with
antivirus and firewall and only gave the users a non-admin local user
account to log in with. Then they just used vpn and RDP to there actual work
desktops to work. No work is done on the local machines, they are just used
like dumb terminals to connect to work.

I was thinking of changing this and making them domain members so I can use
GPO's to control them better. My concern is them being able to log onto the
domain without being connected to the company network. I know as long as
they logon at least once to the domain then they can then log on while
disconnected using cached credentials... but how long can they do this for?
a limited number of times before they would be required to bring the laptop
back to work and logon again? or would the act of logging on via the VPN
(windows RRAS/ISA vpn) renew these cached credential again? or (this one
just came to me) can you still select a dialup (vpn in this case) connection
to be used *first* to authenticate a logon? I recall doing that in windows
2000 I think..?

anyway, my current clients are XP Pro sp2, connecting to windows 2000 native
mode domain via ISA2000/windows2000RRAS vpn.

any input would be appreciated.



Posted by Herb Martin on August 30, 2006, 9:48 am
Please log in for more thread options
>I am setting up a few machines for remote users. In the past I have
>generally not made these machines domain members. I set them up with
>antivirus and firewall and only gave the users a non-admin local user
>account to log in with. Then they just used vpn and RDP to there actual
>work desktops to work. No work is done on the local machines, they are just
>used like dumb terminals to connect to work.

Nothing wrong with this if it works for you.

> I was thinking of changing this and making them domain members so I can
> use GPO's to control them better. My concern is them being able to log
> onto the domain without being connected to the company network. I know as
> long as they logon at least once to the domain then they can then log on
> while disconnected using cached credentials... but how long can they do
> this for? a limited number of times before they would be required to bring
> the laptop back to work and logon again? or would the act of logging on
> via the VPN (windows RRAS/ISA vpn) renew these cached credential again?

Generally forever (I vaguely THINK I remember there is a way to limit
this but I may just be confusing the NUMBER of remembered credentials.)

The real issue is that if they cannot authenticate, what value will it
offer?

They are not going to get any GPO's unless their machines can authenticate.


> or (this one just came to me) can you still select a dialup (vpn in this
> case) connection to be used *first* to authenticate a logon? I recall
> doing that in windows 2000 I think..?

Yes, and while it works it isn't always the most fun to troubleshoot.

> anyway, my current clients are XP Pro sp2, connecting to windows 2000
> native mode domain via ISA2000/windows2000RRAS vpn.
>
> any input would be appreciated.

I think it is a good idea AND that it might be more trouble than
it is worth.

Why not just get ONE MACHINE and try it yourself for a couple
of weeks.... (remember to try out the GPO controlling the machine
idea too.)

--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]



Posted by djc on August 30, 2006, 1:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
thanks for the reply Herb. Please see inline.

>>I am setting up a few machines for remote users. In the past I have
>>generally not made these machines domain members. I set them up with
>>antivirus and firewall and only gave the users a non-admin local user
>>account to log in with. Then they just used vpn and RDP to there actual
>>work desktops to work. No work is done on the local machines, they are
>>just used like dumb terminals to connect to work.
>
> Nothing wrong with this if it works for you.
>
>> I was thinking of changing this and making them domain members so I can
>> use GPO's to control them better. My concern is them being able to log
>> onto the domain without being connected to the company network. I know as
>> long as they logon at least once to the domain then they can then log on
>> while disconnected using cached credentials... but how long can they do
>> this for? a limited number of times before they would be required to
>> bring the laptop back to work and logon again? or would the act of
>> logging on via the VPN (windows RRAS/ISA vpn) renew these cached
>> credential again?
>
> Generally forever (I vaguely THINK I remember there is a way to limit
> this but I may just be confusing the NUMBER of remembered credentials.)
>
> The real issue is that if they cannot authenticate, what value will it
> offer?
>
> They are not going to get any GPO's unless their machines can
> authenticate.

I'm not sure if this is what you mean here but am I overlooking something
with the behavior of GPOs here?
Please correct me if I'm wrong but I am assuming the following behavior:

- user logs onto domain at least once while connected to LAN, domain
computer and user GPOs get applied

- user takes laptop home and logs on with cached domain credentials, same
domain computer and user GPOs are applied (cached)

- after user logs onto VPN the domain computer and user GPOs would be
updated during regular GPO refresh intervals

anything above incorrect? am I wrong about the GPOs being cached?

>
>
>> or (this one just came to me) can you still select a dialup (vpn in this
>> case) connection to be used *first* to authenticate a logon? I recall
>> doing that in windows 2000 I think..?
>
> Yes, and while it works it isn't always the most fun to troubleshoot.
>
>> anyway, my current clients are XP Pro sp2, connecting to windows 2000
>> native mode domain via ISA2000/windows2000RRAS vpn.
>>
>> any input would be appreciated.
>
> I think it is a good idea AND that it might be more trouble than
> it is worth.
>
> Why not just get ONE MACHINE and try it yourself for a couple
> of weeks.... (remember to try out the GPO controlling the machine
> idea too.)

Will do.

thanks Herb
>
> --
> Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
> Accelerated MCSE
> http://www.LearnQuick.Com
> [phone number on web site]
>
>



Posted by Herb Martin on August 30, 2006, 9:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>>I am setting up a few machines for remote users. In the past I have
>>>generally not made these machines domain members. I set them up with
>>>antivirus and firewall and only gave the users a non-admin local user
>>>account to log in with. Then they just used vpn and RDP to there actual
>>>work desktops to work. No work is done on the local machines, they are
>>>just used like dumb terminals to connect to work.
>>
>> Nothing wrong with this if it works for you.
>>
>>> I was thinking of changing this and making them domain members so I can
>>> use GPO's to control them better. My concern is them being able to log
>>> onto the domain without being connected to the company network. I know
>>> as long as they logon at least once to the domain then they can then log
>>> on while disconnected using cached credentials... but how long can they
>>> do this for? a limited number of times before they would be required to
>>> bring the laptop back to work and logon again? or would the act of
>>> logging on via the VPN (windows RRAS/ISA vpn) renew these cached
>>> credential again?
>>
>> Generally forever (I vaguely THINK I remember there is a way to limit
>> this but I may just be confusing the NUMBER of remembered credentials.)
>>
>> The real issue is that if they cannot authenticate, what value will it
>> offer?
>>
>> They are not going to get any GPO's unless their machines can
>> authenticate.
>
> I'm not sure if this is what you mean here but am I overlooking something
> with the behavior of GPOs here?
> Please correct me if I'm wrong but I am assuming the following behavior:
>
> - user logs onto domain at least once while connected to LAN, domain
> computer and user GPOs get applied

Yes. Actually they get applied to the COMPUTER before the user
logs in, based on the COMPUTER authenticating on the domain.

> - user takes laptop home and logs on with cached domain credentials, same
> domain computer and user GPOs are applied (cached)

This is usually not called "applied" but yes the GPOs stick until
the domain can be found again. I started to mention this in my
original post but the main advantage of the GPO is that it can
be updated by the admin anytime, not just that first (and only)
application.

> - after user logs onto VPN the domain computer and user GPOs would be
> updated during regular GPO refresh intervals

This I doubt. Since the computer would need to be authenticated
on the domain and I am unsure whether it would do this through
the VPN if the DC were not available at boot. I just don't know and
this needs to be part of your test (I was thinking about this when I
suggested the testing but didn't specify it.)

> anything above incorrect? am I wrong about the GPOs being cached?
>
>>> or (this one just came to me) can you still select a dialup (vpn in this
>>> case) connection to be used *first* to authenticate a logon? I recall
>>> doing that in windows 2000 I think..?
>>
>> Yes, and while it works it isn't always the most fun to troubleshoot.
>>
>>> anyway, my current clients are XP Pro sp2, connecting to windows 2000
>>> native mode domain via ISA2000/windows2000RRAS vpn.
>>>
>>> any input would be appreciated.
>>
>> I think it is a good idea AND that it might be more trouble than
>> it is worth.
>>
>> Why not just get ONE MACHINE and try it yourself for a couple
>> of weeks.... (remember to try out the GPO controlling the machine
>> idea too.)
>
> Will do.
>
> thanks Herb
>

Anytime I can help...

--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]

> thanks for the reply Herb. Please see inline.
>
>
>> --
>> Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
>> Accelerated MCSE
>> http://www.LearnQuick.Com
>> [phone number on web site]
>>
>>
>
>



Posted by djc on August 31, 2006, 12:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options
thanks for the info Herb. Its appreciated. I'll do some testing.

>>>>I am setting up a few machines for remote users. In the past I have
>>>>generally not made these machines domain members. I set them up with
>>>>antivirus and firewall and only gave the users a non-admin local user
>>>>account to log in with. Then they just used vpn and RDP to there actual
>>>>work desktops to work. No work is done on the local machines, they are
>>>>just used like dumb terminals to connect to work.
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong with this if it works for you.
>>>
>>>> I was thinking of changing this and making them domain members so I can
>>>> use GPO's to control them better. My concern is them being able to log
>>>> onto the domain without being connected to the company network. I know
>>>> as long as they logon at least once to the domain then they can then
>>>> log on while disconnected using cached credentials... but how long can
>>>> they do this for? a limited number of times before they would be
>>>> required to bring the laptop back to work and logon again? or would the
>>>> act of logging on via the VPN (windows RRAS/ISA vpn) renew these cached
>>>> credential again?
>>>
>>> Generally forever (I vaguely THINK I remember there is a way to limit
>>> this but I may just be confusing the NUMBER of remembered credentials.)
>>>
>>> The real issue is that if they cannot authenticate, what value will it
>>> offer?
>>>
>>> They are not going to get any GPO's unless their machines can
>>> authenticate.
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is what you mean here but am I overlooking something
>> with the behavior of GPOs here?
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong but I am assuming the following behavior:
>>
>> - user logs onto domain at least once while connected to LAN, domain
>> computer and user GPOs get applied
>
> Yes. Actually they get applied to the COMPUTER before the user
> logs in, based on the COMPUTER authenticating on the domain.
>
>> - user takes laptop home and logs on with cached domain credentials, same
>> domain computer and user GPOs are applied (cached)
>
> This is usually not called "applied" but yes the GPOs stick until
> the domain can be found again. I started to mention this in my
> original post but the main advantage of the GPO is that it can
> be updated by the admin anytime, not just that first (and only)
> application.
>
>> - after user logs onto VPN the domain computer and user GPOs would be
>> updated during regular GPO refresh intervals
>
> This I doubt. Since the computer would need to be authenticated
> on the domain and I am unsure whether it would do this through
> the VPN if the DC were not available at boot. I just don't know and
> this needs to be part of your test (I was thinking about this when I
> suggested the testing but didn't specify it.)
>
>> anything above incorrect? am I wrong about the GPOs being cached?
>>
>>>> or (this one just came to me) can you still select a dialup (vpn in
>>>> this case) connection to be used *first* to authenticate a logon? I
>>>> recall doing that in windows 2000 I think..?
>>>
>>> Yes, and while it works it isn't always the most fun to troubleshoot.
>>>
>>>> anyway, my current clients are XP Pro sp2, connecting to windows 2000
>>>> native mode domain via ISA2000/windows2000RRAS vpn.
>>>>
>>>> any input would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> I think it is a good idea AND that it might be more trouble than
>>> it is worth.
>>>
>>> Why not just get ONE MACHINE and try it yourself for a couple
>>> of weeks.... (remember to try out the GPO controlling the machine
>>> idea too.)
>>
>> Will do.
>>
>> thanks Herb
>>
>
> Anytime I can help...
>
> --
> Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
> Accelerated MCSE
> http://www.LearnQuick.Com
> [phone number on web site]
>
>> thanks for the reply Herb. Please see inline.
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
>>> Accelerated MCSE
>>> http://www.LearnQuick.Com
>>> [phone number on web site]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Number of logons when disconnected from the Domain? August 4, 2006, 2:37 am
Delete cached local copy of mandatory profile and non roaming domain user profiles ? May 1, 2008, 5:50 am
Limiting Login Times on Particular Machines May 6, 2006, 8:08 pm
Possible to display list of machines where user has logged in? December 17, 2007, 11:46 am
Suddenly Unable to connect to other machines on local network January 8, 2006, 5:45 pm
Root certificate authority no longer added to client machines July 14, 2006, 4:05 pm
Prevent logons other than PC owner? January 16, 2006, 5:32 pm
Auditing Workstation logons from DC January 24, 2006, 7:29 pm
How to use "Number of Previous Logons to Cache" setting September 5, 2005, 4:18 pm
When Should Anonymous Logons Show on Windows 200x? February 13, 2007, 2:09 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap