|
Posted by J. Clarke on January 15, 2005, 11:39 am
Please log in for more thread options Krystian Polak wrote:
>> ?!?!?!?!?! AMD-64 will run any video editing application that a P4 or
>> any other x86 processor will run.
>
> Yes, of course, but with old fanioned 32 bits way,
So?
> unless aplication will
> be able to use its 64 bit and is there such an aplication for video
> editing out there? So, yes, AMD 64 can be a consideration as well as
> Celeron and other invetion, but ....
Except that AMD64 in 32-bit mode is still faster than most 32-bit
processors. It is certainly in a different class from any Celeron.
>> More to the point, the P4 for whatever reason seems to do exceptionally
>> well
>> in video editing benchmarks--it's the one area where it still has a clear
>> performance advantage over the competition.
>
> ...with video editing, 3d renderings, Photoshop and so on, NOW, P4 gives
> the best performance (and price).
>
> Finaly, there will be of course PM 3G beating P4, but not now and not soon
> at the price.
Not necessarily for video editing and the like--it seems that Intel managed
whether by intent or good luck to come up with a good set of optimizations
for that purpose.
> Regards,
>
> K.Polak
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
| 
XML Sitemap