Click here to get back home

processor question

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.sys.laptops    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
processor question Blondie 01-22-2005
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by Blondie on January 22, 2005, 4:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
In relation to processors specifically, which would be the most
suitable/powerful for use in a notebook/laptop which will be primarily used
for video editing. I have no interest in battery life, just performance, I'd
rather spend more money than make compromises on performance and for bonus
points is anybody able to explain where each family of processors would sit
in relation to each other, ie, I understand celeron to be a cut down version
of the real thing, but what is Pentium M and mobile pentium 4 etc.




Posted by Yousuf Khan on January 21, 2005, 8:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Blondie wrote:
> In relation to processors specifically, which would be the most
> suitable/powerful for use in a notebook/laptop which will be primarily used
> for video editing. I have no interest in battery life, just performance, I'd
> rather spend more money than make compromises on performance and for bonus
> points is anybody able to explain where each family of processors would sit
> in relation to each other, ie, I understand celeron to be a cut down version
> of the real thing, but what is Pentium M and mobile pentium 4 etc.

Looks like what you're looking for is the category of laptops known as
desktop replacements (DTR). For these, you would want either a top-end
Intel Pentium 4 processor or a top-end to middle-road AMD Athlon 64
processor.

Celerons are good for puttering around with laptops, if you have not a
lot of requirements for your laptop, and you own a good quality desktop
computer too. It's often nice to have a portable around to lug from your
place a friend's place, etc. You might be able to use it to display some
videos or pictures or stuff. And an occasional light-duty game. An
alternative to this would be an AMD Sempron processor.

Pentium M is the real road-warrior processor -- it's a very low-power
consumption processor. It's mostly used in ultra-light laptops (4lbs or
less), but if they use them in larger laptops, you can expect these
things to last 4 hours or more. There's no real AMD alternative to this
class of processor yet, but AMD has announced that they will create a
processor called Turion which will compete against Pentium M/Centrino.

        Yousuf Khan


Posted by Judd on January 22, 2005, 11:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options
very predictable Youssef

> Blondie wrote:
> > In relation to processors specifically, which would be the most
> > suitable/powerful for use in a notebook/laptop which will be primarily
used
> > for video editing. I have no interest in battery life, just performance,
I'd
> > rather spend more money than make compromises on performance and for
bonus
> > points is anybody able to explain where each family of processors would
sit
> > in relation to each other, ie, I understand celeron to be a cut down
version
> > of the real thing, but what is Pentium M and mobile pentium 4 etc.
>
> Looks like what you're looking for is the category of laptops known as
> desktop replacements (DTR). For these, you would want either a top-end
> Intel Pentium 4 processor or a top-end to middle-road AMD Athlon 64
> processor.
>
> Celerons are good for puttering around with laptops, if you have not a
> lot of requirements for your laptop, and you own a good quality desktop
> computer too. It's often nice to have a portable around to lug from your
> place a friend's place, etc. You might be able to use it to display some
> videos or pictures or stuff. And an occasional light-duty game. An
> alternative to this would be an AMD Sempron processor.
>
> Pentium M is the real road-warrior processor -- it's a very low-power
> consumption processor. It's mostly used in ultra-light laptops (4lbs or
> less), but if they use them in larger laptops, you can expect these
> things to last 4 hours or more. There's no real AMD alternative to this
> class of processor yet, but AMD has announced that they will create a
> processor called Turion which will compete against Pentium M/Centrino.
>
> Yousuf Khan




Posted by Yousuf Khan on January 23, 2005, 3:19 am
Please log in for more thread options
Judd wrote:
> very predictable Youssef

Very predictable question too.

        Yousuf Khan


Posted by AJ on January 23, 2005, 12:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Blondie wrote:
>> In relation to processors specifically, which would be the most
suitable/powerful for use in a notebook/laptop which will
>> be primarily used for video editing. I have no interest in battery life, just
performance, I'd rather spend more money
>> than make compromises on performance and for bonus points is anybody able to
explain where each family of processors would
>> sit in relation to each other, ie, I understand celeron to be a cut down
version of the real thing, but what is Pentium M
>> and mobile pentium 4 etc.
>
> Looks like what you're looking for is the category of laptops known as desktop
replacements (DTR). For these, you would
> want either a top-end Intel Pentium 4 processor or a top-end to middle-road
AMD Athlon 64 processor.
>
> Celerons are good for puttering around with laptops, if you have not a lot of
requirements for your laptop, and you own a
> good quality desktop computer too. It's often nice to have a portable around
to lug from your place a friend's place, etc.
> You might be able to use it to display some videos or pictures or stuff. And
an occasional light-duty game. An alternative
> to this would be an AMD Sempron processor.
>
> Pentium M is the real road-warrior processor -- it's a very low-power
consumption processor. It's mostly used in
> ultra-light laptops (4lbs or less), but if they use them in larger laptops,
you can expect these things to last 4 hours or
> more. There's no real AMD alternative to this class of processor yet, but AMD
has announced that they will create a
> processor called Turion which will compete against Pentium M/Centrino.

Why anyone would post about AMD in an Intel newsgroup escapes me (no
it doesn't!). It's just annoying! The biggest reason NOT to buy AMD is
quickly becoming the religious followers of it! Read: every post about
CPUs does NOT have to have "AMD" in it. It's off topic in csi (IMO).
The newsgroup names should be a way of filtering and narrowing
down toward the category one wishes to find information on. Posting
about AMD in csi only lowers the signal-to-noise ratio: AMD-related
info is "noise" in csi (IMO). I believe people come here because they've
chosen Intel or have an Intel product and desire information on.. Intel!
Save the CPU debates, religious wars and marketeering/spamming for
some other group. 'comp.sys.intel' is not equivalent to 'comp.sys.cpus'
(shouldn't be, IMO. Else what's the point of categorizing at all?).

AJ




Similar ThreadsPosted
question about AMD processor August 25, 2005, 3:16 pm
Processor Question from new guy January 18, 2008, 12:24 am
New Laptop Processor question May 27, 2006, 8:39 pm
Intel processor specs question October 9, 2007, 1:22 pm
Processor question (possibly for Andrew, who seems to know his stuff) June 15, 2005, 2:26 pm
Intel Pentium M Processor 730 (1.6Ghz) versus Intel Mobile Pentium 4 Processor 538 (3.2Ghz)?? March 9, 2006, 2:01 pm
Duo vs M processor March 21, 2006, 10:39 am
processor recommendation January 15, 2005, 8:00 pm
Help Choosing Processor February 16, 2005, 2:58 pm
processor usage May 13, 2005, 9:41 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap