|
Posted by raylopez99 on July 28, 2008, 8:38 am
Please log in for more thread options
avoid this new search engine, cuil.com, it's a publicity stunt just to
get people to try it and then they can sell out, probably to Google.
For example, I tried this search: "Google Groups" and got: We didn=92t
find any results for =93google groups=94
You can try ask.com for an alternative to Google, but I've found that
ask.com also is not that great because it has more holes than Google
and also takes longer to load.
RL
|
|
Posted by Andrew Heenan on July 28, 2008, 9:41 am
Please log in for more thread options
> avoid this new search engine, it's a publicity stunt just to
> get people to try it and then they can sell out, probably to Google.
Why on Earth would Google buy it?
If YOU spotted it's a dud, I'm guessing Google saw that 9 months ago.
Dream on, old son, dream on!
--
Andrew
seo2seo.com
sick-site-syndrome.com
UK Residents:
STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff"
Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the
very poorest tell your friends about this petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/
|
|
Posted by Paul on July 28, 2008, 1:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:38:49 -0700 (PDT), raylopez99
>avoid this new search engine, cuil.com, it's a publicity stunt just to
>get people to try it and then they can sell out, probably to Google.
Former Googleers unveil Cuil, a new search engine
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080728/wr_nm/internet_search_dc
|
|
Posted by Brandon on July 28, 2008, 7:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Not very useful. The images they throw in completely distract from
the result snippets, and the images often don't have anything to do
with the page they link to.
--
Brandon Staggs
http://www.brandonstaggs.com
|
|
Posted by Paul on July 28, 2008, 10:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
>Not very useful. The images they throw in completely distract from
>the result snippets, and the images often don't have anything to do
>with the page they link to.
I agree.
Search for First People
I see a number of sites that it has used my logo for and yet that
image is not on any of those sites. And yet my site doesn't show my
logo but some other site instead.
Links fail to work at times even though the URL is correct.
Also fails - at times - to show results for page 2 onwards.
Big pile of shite if you ask me.
Waaaaaaaaay too early to go live with IMHO.
plh
Paul
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | slightly ot - google street view | June 11, 2007, 10:53 pm |
| CUIL.COM is Terrible !!!!!!! | July 29, 2008, 4:12 pm |
| Search Engine Optimization - Low Cost Search Engine Marketing Service | September 11, 2007, 12:29 am |
| New Search Engine Launched - Ogleo.com - An Integrated Search Engine | January 27, 2007, 7:40 am |
| Re: SEO Services - Search Engine Optimization - SEM - Search Engine Submission | July 5, 2008, 11:35 am |
| [Slightly OT} Quirky trivia | March 3, 2006, 2:22 am |
| Slightly OT : Adsense and Yahoo | July 30, 2007, 11:21 am |
| ~article~ Rewriting the net address books - slightly OT | June 14, 2006, 10:43 pm |
| Search Good Search Engine At Google | April 27, 2006, 6:07 am |
| google search engine | November 14, 2005, 11:25 pm |
|
XML Sitemap