Click here to get back home

ipsec

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 microsoft.public.windows.server.security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
ipsec philKGH 10-29-2005
`--> Re: ipsec Miha Pihler [MV...10-29-2005
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by philKGH on October 29, 2005, 4:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
I am studying IPSEC as part of Microsoft course 2277 on Windows 2003 and I
have the following question:

I have two 2003 servers networked together, each with a shared folder, and
one of the practices is to implement ipsec between the two and test
connectivity by showing that the share on the other server can be accessed or
not. With no ipsec in place, both servers can see each others share, as
expected. When "Secure server (require security)" is assigned on one server,
the other server cannot see its share, as expected. However, when "Secure
server (require security)" is the nassigned on the other server, they still
cannot see each other's share. My understanding is that if the same security
is applied at both ends, then communication can occur.

Am I understanding it incorrectly? Can someone suggest why it diesn't work?

Regards,
Phil.


Posted by Miha Pihler [MVP] on October 29, 2005, 4:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi Phil,

Are these two computers members of same domain?

If not what was authentication that you set for IPSec?

Try setting Respond only on server A and Require Security on server B. Now
try to access the share from server A to server B.

--
Mike
Microsoft MVP - Windows Security


>I am studying IPSEC as part of Microsoft course 2277 on Windows 2003 and I
> have the following question:
>
> I have two 2003 servers networked together, each with a shared folder, and
> one of the practices is to implement ipsec between the two and test
> connectivity by showing that the share on the other server can be accessed
> or
> not. With no ipsec in place, both servers can see each others share, as
> expected. When "Secure server (require security)" is assigned on one
> server,
> the other server cannot see its share, as expected. However, when "Secure
> server (require security)" is the nassigned on the other server, they
> still
> cannot see each other's share. My understanding is that if the same
> security
> is applied at both ends, then communication can occur.
>
> Am I understanding it incorrectly? Can someone suggest why it diesn't
> work?
>
> Regards,
> Phil.




Similar ThreadsPosted
OSX and Ipsec September 17, 2006, 11:14 pm
IPSec September 12, 2007, 6:33 pm
IPSec blocked my BDC July 6, 2005, 12:37 pm
IPSec Replication August 15, 2005, 4:55 am
two CA certificates for IPSec or something... September 17, 2005, 3:58 pm
IPSec NAT-T disabled on SP2 September 19, 2005, 12:11 pm
Problem with IPSEC July 17, 2006, 10:53 am
IPSec Filter August 31, 2006, 11:23 pm
IPSec and Kerberos September 27, 2006, 10:17 am
two CA certificates for IPSec or something... February 16, 2007, 1:57 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap