Click here to get back home

'google' 2

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
'google' 2 tatata9999 10-20-2007
---> Re: 'google' 2 Adrienne Boswel...10-20-2007
| | ---> Re: 'google' 2 David Quinton10-21-2007
| | `--> Re: 'google' 2 Andy Dingley10-21-2007
| | `--> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-21-2007
| ---> Re: 'google' 2 Beauregard T. S...10-21-2007
| | ---> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-21-2007
| | |   ---> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-21-2007
| ---> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-21-2007
| |--> Re: 'google' 2 Beauregard T. S...10-21-2007
| ---> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-22-2007
---> Re: 'google' 2 Michael Fesser10-21-2007
| ---> Re: 'google' 2 André Gillibert10-22-2007
---> Re: 'google' 2 Harlan Messinge...10-22-2007
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by Andy Dingley on October 21, 2007, 8:16 am
Please log in for more thread options
On 21 Oct, 03:38, tatata9...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > 2. Put CSS in an external stylesheet.
> > 3. Put javascript in an external script.

> Yes, I read about using include file for js, so, I just did.

Which is the complete opposite of what you were told

> As for CSS, I've even eliminated them for now for speed sake.

You're mad, aren't you?


Posted by tatata9999 on October 21, 2007, 11:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
> On 21 Oct, 03:38, tatata9...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> > > 2. Put CSS in an external stylesheet.
> > > 3. Put javascript in an external script.
> > Yes, I read about using include file for js, so, I just did.
>
> Which is the complete opposite of what you were told
You lost me here.

>
> > As for CSS, I've even eliminated them for now for speed sake.
>
> You're mad, aren't you?
You're right, I don't see its syntax's logic (not from a designer's
background).



Posted by André Gillibert on October 21, 2007, 9:04 am
Please log in for more thread options
tatata9999@gmail.com wrote:

> Now, I would think more and more web-based applications are coming into
> the fray, my recent experience with google's webbot (indexing engine, a
> part of the google's search service) tells me that its indexing
> algorithm does not consider a database-driven web application as part of
> a qualified 'web site'.

Google doesn't index your "database" pages because you didn't provide a
public access!
Otherwise, google has perfectly fine algorithms to crawl database driven
sites.
For google indexing, keep in mind that AJAX is very unfriendly to bots
(and to people who have a good browser).

> As for CSS, I've even eliminated them for now for speed sake.

POSH (Plain Old Semantic HTML) visually improved by a stylesheet results
in much smaller code than table driven HTML code designed with its layout
in mind only.

Your code is not optimized.
For example, this page:
http://web.mytata.net:8000/myTA/index2_so.cfm?utype=s
Uses 6819 bytes.
It could get down to 600 bytes (you would have to remove that JavaScript
thing).

> As for images, I have only a few tiny ones.

That's ok.

> One thing I want to do away is a bit too many tables.

Table layouts are a bad thing.

--
If you've a question that doesn't belong to Usenet, contact me at

Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on October 21, 2007, 9:40 am
Please log in for more thread options
André Gillibert wrote:

> It could get down to 600 bytes (you would have to remove that
> JavaScript thing).

Do you mean the 22,050 bytes of urchintracker.js ? :-)

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck

Posted by André Gillibert on October 21, 2007, 9:46 am
Please log in for more thread options
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> André Gillibert wrote:
>
>> It could get down to 600 bytes (you would have to remove that
>> JavaScript thing).
>
> Do you mean the 22,050 bytes of urchintracker.js ? :-)
>

The 217 bytes of toggle.js, the 21411 bytes of urchin.js, and #6000 bytes
of useless/invisible tag soup.

--
If you've a question that doesn't belong to Usenet, contact me at

Similar ThreadsPosted
re google bot April 26, 2006, 2:21 am
Why has Google sent me to Coventry? January 28, 2005, 4:54 pm
Google Bot problems? March 9, 2005, 3:03 pm
google satellite map June 28, 2005, 5:06 pm
ALT attribute at Google January 4, 2006, 5:57 pm
Google broke itself September 23, 2006, 4:46 pm
Google incremental September 28, 2008, 4:55 pm
google.com javascript October 17, 2008, 8:59 am
Google Adsense problem August 15, 2005, 5:55 am
Google HTML -> WAP converter January 15, 2006, 12:36 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap