|
Posted by Computerguy on January 21, 2008, 1:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Hello,
>
> > > this is not really a security issue, but more a functionnal issue.
> > > Roaming profile won't get updated, as it is updated at logoff.
>
> > > We use a vbscript to reboot stations, which force logoff on the way.
> > > You may change the code to only logoff without shutting down the pc
> > > Are you intereseted in ?
>
> > > --
> > > Cordialement,
> > > Mathieu CHATEAU
> > > English blog:http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
> > > French blog:http://www.lotp.fr
>
>
..
>
> > > > Is there any security threat to the following ?
> > > > - windows xp2 is locked (have to enter Ctrl+Alt+Del)
> > > > - servers setup to disconnect users at 10:00 PM
>
> > > > For electricity savings reasons we are starting to request users
> > > > logoff and shutdown at the end of the day. Right now we have users
> > > > who forget to logoff, but their PC will go to the Windows XP locked
> > > > screen. If we are in the wrong forum please let us know to repost.
> > > > Thanks.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Mr. Chateau,
>
> > We are interested in anything to get staff to exit the network. I
> > almost forget we have files synching at logoff to their directory and
> > if they never logoff..... We have Altiris and tried assigning a job
> > to restart at 10:00 PM, but when users do shutdown they would come in
> > the next day and after powering on the computer they are greeted by
> > the same shutdown job that powers off their computer. At first we
> > were looking for software. We would welcome a script to somehow
> > remove users from the network at a certain time.
>
> > =3D=3D=3D> If you don't get a scripted solution to force users to do wha=
t
> > company
> > policy tells them they should do, you could run a job at 10pm that check=
s
> > to
> > see which workstations are logged on. 'net view' will do this, but the
> > output might need to be filtered to include only workstations at your
> > location. A further step would be to also determine who is logged in at
> > each
> > workstation - a bit trickier but doable.
>
> > Then for the first week or two you send each person logged in (or the
> > owners
> > of the powered on computers) an email reminding them of the company
> > policy,
> > and that a report of powered on workstations/logged in users will be sen=
t
> > to
> > the president (or whomever).
>
> > /Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Mr. Dunbar,
>
> =A0 =A0Users cannot login before 6:00 AM. =A0I come in a couple times a we=
ek
> early to do things (best time is to get things done when there is no
> one on the network). =A0We can see the users still logged in and send an
> email to the supervisors. =A0We have been doing this for 2 years and we
> have the same 10 to 15 people who repeat.
>
> =3D=3D=3D> Yes, I am familiar with the phenomenon of the users who routine=
ly
> refuse to follow suggested best practices. That is why I suggested the
> reference to company policy.
>
> But in reviewing the thread I see that you initially said that the goal wa=
s
> one of electrical power savings. If the power bill is paid from *your*
> budget, look for some way to implement a charge back for workstations left=
> on. Failing that, shutdown the server every Wednesday and tell people that=
> since you are getting no cooperation from users to shutdown their computer=
s
> when they are not using them, and not getting additional funding for the
> increased power costs, this is your only option. If upper management says
> that that is not appropriate, tell them that they need to either get the
> users to help, or pay for the power used.
>
> If the power bill is paid from someone else's budget, send that
> person/department, copies of the emails you have been sending for 2 years,=
> and cc them any of these messages you send in the future. If you have done=
> your best, but are just getting poor support, well, at least you've done
> your best.
>
> But let me ask you this: how much does it cost to leave those 15 computers=
> on all the time? And is this *your* initiative, or something you have been=
> tasked with? I hate to rain on your parade, but if your primary function i=
s
> to support your company's infrastructure, taking it upon yourself to get
> people to shutdown computers to save money is likely inappropriate. Do you=
> check to make sure their coffee machines are off after hours?
>
> /Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
We are doing what one of our sending district's is doing and it just
part of a bigger picture of cost savings. We are also talking around
300 to 400 computers overall. None of the lab computers get shutdown
(about 250 right there) you will get a most users to logoff, but not
shutdown. Our overall objective eventually is to get users to
shutdown. We have different higher ups requiring different things.
Shutting down would take care of everything, but we (in the tech
department) would like them to logoff for security reasons.
|