|
Posted by Big Bill on February 4, 2008, 5:36 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:59:46 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:10:42 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
>> >On Feb 3, 7:24 am, "Jezsta Web Productions" wrote:
>>
>> >> link "out" to other related and such articles.
>>
>> >YOU are the only one in this thread discussing OUTBOUND LINKS genius.
>>
>> Well I had the impression they wre being discussed by other people
>> myself.
>
>No. Just her & quite persistently too.
>
>Original OP post:
>
>"im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
>loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
>thoughts "
>
>NOFOLLOW
>INTERNAL LINKS
>JUICE FLOW
>
>Her advice: "You need out going links
>that are related to help your relevance also."
>
>simply dumbfounding
>
>I gave the OP a decent answer but nobody will ever find it in this
>thread after her ongoing outgoing-link rants. What a waste of
>communication tools by someone who should be intelligent enough and
>familiar enough to know better.
>
>There should be a question, various answers, and a discussion about
>the difference in opinion (with relevant sources referenced) - rather
>than a terroristic troll spamming her peer's information in a
>vindictive tantrum because she has nothing better to do with her time.
>Some people call it crapping where you eat.
>
>simply dumbfounding
Were you ever diagnosed? Don't feel bothered by the question, we get
all kinds here. I'm wondering if your particular brand of
misperception has a name.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/
| 
XML Sitemap