Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary. Now with pictures!
- Posted on
- 64th inert character
- Mike - EMAIL IGNORED
May 7, 2005, 7:14 pm
rate this thread
Re: 64th inert character
:they have no interpretation on must systems or the net.
No interpretation as special control characters, I think you
mean. Not entirely true, in that in Unix systems using the
older traditional "line discipline", _ is a delete character.
:I represent them as a regex: [a-zA-Z0-9_].
:That is 63 characters. To create a base 64 encoding, I
:need one more. Any suggestions?
Uses [a-zA-Z0-9+/] with = as the pad.
Oh, to be a Blobel!