Click here to get back home

comfused about how to compare laptops

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.sys.laptops    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
comfused about how to compare laptops alexr 10-24-2005
Posted by alexr on October 24, 2005, 10:58 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi, i'm not sure how to compare laptops...an amd 64 2.2 ghz with a
centrino m740 1.73 ghz...with a p4 3 ghz. and the p4 has a 5400 rpm hdd
v 4200 rpm for the other 2. What i don't understand is that people have
said the centrino may be faster even though it has less ghz...and then
the amd is 64 bit so that may be better? so how to compare? oh and i
don't care about battery life/weight.


Thnx



Posted by bxf on October 25, 2005, 7:13 am
Please log in for more thread options

alexr wrote:
> Hi, i'm not sure how to compare laptops...an amd 64 2.2 ghz with a
> centrino m740 1.73 ghz...with a p4 3 ghz.

Each of these processors uses different technology, hence the numbers
are not comparable.

> ...and the p4 has a 5400 rpm hdd
> v 4200 rpm for the other

A faster disk should improve the performance of any laptop, regardless
of the processor. Some are available with a 7200 rpm drive.

> 2. What i don't understand is that people have
> said the centrino may be faster even though it has less ghz

It is possible to make a general statement indicating roughly how these
processors compare, but in reality, each may have its strengths and
weaknesses. Thus, one processor may be faster for some tasks and
another may be faster for others. You need to look at some benchmark
results to see where each one excels. You can try WWW.TOMSHARDWARE.COM,
for example.

> ...and then
> the amd is 64 bit so that may be better? so how to compare?

This may be an advantage when we have applications that require and
take advantage of 64bit architecture. Until then, I believe there are
no advantages.

> oh and i
> don't care about battery life/weight.

You will generally get a better bang for the buck with a desktop rather
than a laptop.



Posted by Russ on October 28, 2005, 7:34 am
Please log in for more thread options
The AMD 64 bit CPU's are very fast, even with 32 bit programs. If you don't
care about battery life, I would consider the AMD.... I run them in my
desktop machines and they perform well.

--
Russ

Visit Alaska @ http://www.tannersacre.com

>
> alexr wrote:
> > Hi, i'm not sure how to compare laptops...an amd 64 2.2 ghz with a
> > centrino m740 1.73 ghz...with a p4 3 ghz.
>
> Each of these processors uses different technology, hence the numbers
> are not comparable.
>
> > ...and the p4 has a 5400 rpm hdd
> > v 4200 rpm for the other
>
> A faster disk should improve the performance of any laptop, regardless
> of the processor. Some are available with a 7200 rpm drive.
>
> > 2. What i don't understand is that people have
> > said the centrino may be faster even though it has less ghz
>
> It is possible to make a general statement indicating roughly how these
> processors compare, but in reality, each may have its strengths and
> weaknesses. Thus, one processor may be faster for some tasks and
> another may be faster for others. You need to look at some benchmark
> results to see where each one excels. You can try WWW.TOMSHARDWARE.COM,
> for example.
>
> > ...and then
> > the amd is 64 bit so that may be better? so how to compare?
>
> This may be an advantage when we have applications that require and
> take advantage of 64bit architecture. Until then, I believe there are
> no advantages.
>
> > oh and i
> > don't care about battery life/weight.
>
> You will generally get a better bang for the buck with a desktop rather
> than a laptop.
>




Posted by J. Clarke on October 28, 2005, 8:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
"Russ" <sourdo55 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> The AMD 64 bit CPU's are very fast, even with 32 bit programs. If you
> don't care about battery life, I would consider the AMD.... I run them in
> my desktop machines and they perform well.

The power consumption on the Turions is on a par with that of the Pentium M.
Apparently there are some machines out there that take advantage of that
capability.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)


Similar ThreadsPosted
Laptops - Compare And Buy June 19, 2007, 1:49 pm
where can i compare laptop CPUs? November 23, 2006, 12:05 pm
What is exactly refurbished laptop compare to regular dell/IBM laptop? November 8, 2004, 11:19 am
I am looking for refurbished laptops for third world countries, whom to contact if I want to buy laptops May 29, 2005, 5:56 pm
question about Dell laptops- laptops in general? June 27, 2005, 6:08 pm
Laptops- Read Features of branded Laptops September 26, 2008, 7:10 am
RFD: new newsgroup comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad or alt.sys.laptops.thinkpad October 20, 2006, 12:52 pm
Win XP SP2 on new laptops? December 1, 2004, 10:58 pm
AMD 64 laptops December 2, 2004, 2:49 pm
Do all laptops run hot?? December 6, 2004, 1:24 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap