Re: fourq.host.sk is down!

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Not only is that site up, it's a fuckin laugh-riot.

What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404" just to
see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html back as soon as
he started boasting?  LOL!  That's an old trick, but it's always good for
a few laughs.

Re: fourq.host.sk is down!

Quoted text here. Click to load it

It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a renamed
html file. But gone.


Quoted text here. Click to load it

*yawn* read it in weep auk bitch,

If this will occur one more time the user account will be deleted.

*grin*


Re: fourq.host.sk is down!

On 31 May 2007 04:10:12 -0700, Dustin Cook

Quoted text here. Click to load it

AUK bitch?

--
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
http://blu05.port5.com
AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07
#20 Usenet asshole
#6 Lits Slut
#9  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
< we all know how well that works...LOL >
Co-inventer of the "Prongtard Yap-Dog Award"

<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>


Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a friggin
moron.

Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free to keep
it up for a while.

Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did. :)
 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.

On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on another
page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner. Truth be told, he still
has no freaking idea what it is. If you find ignorance like that
hilarious, than well, it obviously doesn't take much to amuse a simpleton
like yourself...


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Unlike you, I don't fall for "404" trolls.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Who cares what it is.  The funny thing about his site is that it's making
you sing and dance on Usenet.

(Follow-up game thwarted.  Is the humiliation getting to you, or
something?  LOL)

Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Oh, I wouldn't be so sure, your already his bitch.
 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Uh huh. Sure...
 


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

<sarcasm>
Oh, BURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRN!!  Damn, that was fuckin harsh.
</sarcasm>

Re: fourq.host.sk is down!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

But, alas it is a scanner. :)


Quoted text here. Click to load it

BugHunter doesn't make use of any file's name. And it's not using a
simpleton checksum algorithm either, idiot. The reason I'm using a
filelength as an indicator is so that, unlike your half ass attempt at
writing a bughunter clone, I don't need to scan every single file on the
hard drive. You weren't even aware of that fact until I had to point it
out to you, in a comparison of why my algorithm is better than yours; as
yours waste time and resources checking files it shouldn't on a cold day
in hell have a md5 match for.

You cannot answer any questions regarding the program that have been
asked of you since it was released. You couldn't even write a halfway
decent clone of the program. You tried to pass off your sorry example as
a clone, but they aren't anything alike. Time and time again, you show us
all what you really don't know about malware and scanners alike.

Your friend pcbutts relies on filenames, nobody elses scanners do as far
as I know. Filenames, like md5summing every single file on your hard disk
is the mark of a wannabe coder, who doesn't grasp what it is he's trying
to do.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Your twisting what I said about your primitive work. As you rely on a
different md5 for each and every possible malware file you could run
across, your program is the one that will and does miss any variation.
Mine on the other hand could miss some variances, but will not miss them
all. It's smart enough to know it doesn't have to scan each and every
single file on your hard disk. For someone who claims to be interested in
Artificial Intelligence as you do, one would think you'd write a program
that atleast could make a determination of whether or not the file needed
to be scanned. You don't.
 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

I'm not embarrased about the program, quiet the opposite in fact. It's
continuing to win awards as more sites begin mirroring it.

it does it's job quiet well, various respected individuals in the
antimalware scene and data recovery scene, including a former nemesis are
thankful for the work I've done. :) Robert Greene even uses it. *grin*
 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Actually, any serious programmer knows you don't need the source code to
figure out how something works. Your whining about the fact I won't turn
over my hard work doesn't change that fact. You shouldn't need source
code if your half as good as you'd like us to think you are.

You actually sound like one of those paranoid people who refuse to use
utorrent because it's author won't provide the source code for it.

You shouldn't need to decompress it or even use procdump. You should be
able to determine what it is exactly and how it works with softice or ida
pro alone. I don't do any oddball interrupts. everything is well
documented.

We all know you don't actually possess any of the required skill to do
this, as you would know how BugHunter works by now if you did. You've
made yet another error in your diagnosis; BugHunter doesn't give a shit
what a files name is. Your friend, pcbutts script on the other hand,
does.

To prove you don't know what the hell your talking about (as usual), I'd
like for you to show me the code where BugHunter depends on filenames. As
well as the entries in the database files, if you please.

Since you claim it relies on filenames, you should know the filenames it
relies on as well, I'd like for you to post those too, please.

To ensure you can't cheat, BugHunter's algorithm is known and has been
known to some since it was originally released. So, answer my questions
then :)

Don't make too much of an ass of yourself on alt.hackers.malicious. You
started cross-posting this flame war to them in an effort to recruit
some. Do you think any of them will work for someone as dumb as you?
 
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


Site Timeline