A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View


Hi, do you know A-squared.Anti-Malware?
Is it a very good antispyware? I already use some antispyware like
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, Spybot - Search & Destroy, etc.
In your opinion is it very good?
thanks

Re: A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?




| Hi, do you know A-squared.Anti-Malware?
| Is it a very good antispyware? I already use some antispyware like
| Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, Spybot - Search & Destroy, etc.
| In your opinion is it very good?
| thanks

It is good but prone to False Positives.

Stick with Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware and I suggest Avira AntiVir for anti virus.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



Re: A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?



st.luck@NOSPAMkatamail.com wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it


Adequate. Free version included in Portable Apps. What you already have
is better.

wolf k.

Re: A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?



st.luck@NOSPAMkatamail.com says...
Quoted text here. Click to load it

In addition to the excellent advice you have already received allow me
to point out that A Squared is slow, sometimes very slow.
SuperAntiSpyware and Malware Bytes are much better.

--
James E. Morrow
 Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

Re: A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?



On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:15:24 -0500, James Morrow

Quoted text here. Click to load it

Hmmm.  I've had both a-squared professional and SAS running real time
for years and wouldn't say either is faster than the other.  They both
appear faster than MB, which I run occasionally.  Since there are free
versions of each one might as well use all three.
--=20
Robin=20
(BrE)
Herts, England=20

Re: A-squared.Anti-Malware: do you know it?



Robin Bignall wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Occasionally I run some of those appz for curiosity and can say as of this past
weekend that SAS took almost three times as long to scan my system as MBAM,
of course neither hit on any thing and almost as good, neither gave any false
positives.

Site Timeline