Re: XHTML1.0 validation problem - Page 2

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View

Re: XHTML1.0 validation problem

Toby A Inkster wrote:

Quoted text here. Click to load it
Yes good point. But anybody who registers an address with nospam in it is
asking for trouble I guess :-)

I note that seems to have been closed for upgrading since
October 2002 - looks like a dead duck to me.

So what services do people use for an email address that they never check?
It obviously has to have a mail box that doesn't fill up or is
automatically emptied, so a hotmail or similar isn't much use.
remove ".nospam" from my reply address

Site Timeline