|
Posted by brucie on November 15, 2004, 6:59 pm
Please log in for more thread options
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html Sam Hughes said:
> http://news.individual.net/ Unless things have changed, its sign-up
> system is midieval, though -- it required sending an email to
> somebody, who a few days later would send an email in reply.
i think its practical rather than medieval. if it was auto it would be
too open to abuse. it may annoy people who are used to our instant
gratification society but tuff.
--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.
|
|
Posted by Sam Hughes on November 15, 2004, 2:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
$.dlg@usenetshit.info:
> In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html Sam Hughes said:
>
>> http://news.individual.net/ Unless things have changed, its sign-up
>> system is midieval, though -- it required sending an email to
>> somebody, who a few days later would send an email in reply.
>
> i think its practical rather than medieval.
Who said medieval was bad?
|
|
Posted by brucie on November 16, 2004, 11:03 am
Please log in for more thread options In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html Sam Hughes said:
> Who said medieval was bad?
i especially like the raping and pillaging part
--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.
|
|
Posted by brucie on November 15, 2004, 12:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html Crom said:
>> What is the accepted way to share a message across multiple
>> newsgroups? http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html
> Yes, if your news server didnt reject posts with more than one group in
> the newsgroup line...
http://news.individual.net/
--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.
|
|
Posted by brucie on November 15, 2004, 12:49 pm
Please log in for more thread options In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html Crom said:
> <LINK REL="icon" HREF="/icon.ico" TYPE="image/ico">
> <LINK REL="SHORTCUT ICON" HREF="/icon.ico">
>
> My question is this. Is one of these methods more correct (or standard)
the only standard is the correct syntax for the <link> element, other
than that its up to each UA what they want to do with it, if anything.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#edef-LINK
--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | IE 6 and favicons | May 11, 2005, 10:00 pm |
| address bar icons | August 5, 2004, 10:40 pm |
| Using Icons As Images | June 30, 2005, 9:14 am |
| >> Quick question about Favicons | July 19, 2004, 4:18 pm |
| IExplorer Image Icons off | October 21, 2004, 3:06 pm |
| changing icons of sites on favourites menu | October 21, 2004, 10:19 pm |
| How can I replace a large image with other large images triggered from small image icons, mouse-overs or whatever??? | July 26, 2004, 1:34 am |
| Is this website ok | May 13, 2006, 1:04 am |
| How is this website made???? | August 26, 2004, 6:30 am |
| Get all Link from a Website | November 18, 2004, 2:51 pm |
|
XML Sitemap