|
Posted by Edward_Tolman on December 10, 2006, 5:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options >
>
> > http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/newsroom/20061206b.html
> >
> > Compare the large bright blotch to the right of
> > the claimed water flow on the newer photo
> > with the older. It is brighter. There is also
> > a dark line to the left of the blotch on the
> > old photo which appears as light as the claimed
> > water flow in the new photo. Can all these be
> > water flows or is it just the lighting?
> >
> > Ed
> >
>
> Yes, it could possibly be something to do with the lighting. It could be
> water. It could have been liquid something else. It could have been
> something related to the soil structure. Until we put something there that
> can actually read that it is water, we won't know for sure.
Well, they sure were trumpeting it as "WATER FLOWING NOW!!!"
There may be some frozen water or CO2 frost there reflecting
light which wasn't picked up in the older photo, but the
case for water flowing in the last few years appears pretty
weak to me.
Excuse my cynicism, but it appears to be someone trying to
justify their job after the MGS disappeared rather than
genuine science.
Ed
|