|
Posted by Armand Karlsen on November 29, 2004, 4:04 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I have a website ( http://www.zen62775.zen.co.uk ) that I made HTML 4.01
Transitional and CSS compliant, and I'm thinking of converting it into XHTML
to learn a little about it. Which XHTML variant would you recommend? The w3c
HTML validator mentions XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Basic, Strict, and XHTML
1.1. Would I be able to make my existing CSS work in the XHTML page without
modification to the .css file?
|
|
Posted by Philipp Lenssen on November 29, 2004, 4:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Armand Karlsen wrote:
> I have a website ( http://www.zen62775.zen.co.uk ) that I made HTML
> 4.01 Transitional and CSS compliant, and I'm thinking of converting
> it into XHTML to learn a little about it. Which XHTML variant would
> you recommend? The w3c HTML validator mentions XHTML 1.0
> Transitional, Basic, Strict, and XHTML 1.1. Would I be able to make
> my existing CSS work in the XHTML page without modification to the
> .css file?
HTML Tidy might be of great help to automatically concert your pages. I
suggest XHTML 1 Strict but you may go for something else. If you are
using "transitional" a move to "strict" may cause some headaches now,
but they should be worth it in the long run.
--
Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com
|
|
Posted by Andreas Prilop on November 29, 2004, 5:23 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Armand Karlsen wrote:
> Subject: Tips and advice on converting from HTML 4.01 Trans. to XHTML
Tip: Don't.
Go to HTML 4.01 Strict if you want to convert something and don't know
what to do else in your spare time.
--
Top-posting.
What's the most irritating thing on Usenet?
|
|
Posted by Armand Karlsen on November 29, 2004, 4:36 pm
Please log in for more thread options > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Armand Karlsen wrote:
>
> > Subject: Tips and advice on converting from HTML 4.01 Trans. to XHTML
>
> Tip: Don't.
> Go to HTML 4.01 Strict if you want to convert something and don't know
> what to do else in your spare time.
>
Is converting HTML 4.01 Transitional to XHTML-anything a pain?
|
|
Posted by Lars Eighner on November 29, 2004, 11:15 am
Please log in for more thread options In our last episode,
the lovely and talented Armand Karlsen
broadcast on comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Armand Karlsen wrote:
>>
>> > Subject: Tips and advice on converting from HTML 4.01 Trans. to XHTML
>>
>> Tip: Don't.
>> Go to HTML 4.01 Strict if you want to convert something and don't know
>> what to do else in your spare time.
>>
> Is converting HTML 4.01 Transitional to XHTML-anything a pain?
No. Tidy can be persuaded to do a pretty good job of converting -
if you have a valid HTML 4.01 * document to begin with. Otherwise:
GIGO.
--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/ Nobody home but the lights, and they're out too.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Advice on transferring and converting web site | May 12, 2005, 12:42 pm |
| I follow the following steps to converting from HTML to XHTML | March 8, 2005, 12:17 am |
| HTML, CSS tips and tricks | November 15, 2006, 1:42 am |
| Converting links in HTML documents to relative URL ? | September 4, 2008, 5:28 am |
| Converting HTML Form Data into Webpage Output ? | January 17, 2005, 1:06 pm |
| Advice needed for HTML layout | August 11, 2004, 9:53 pm |
| HTML problem. Converting a Webpage into Word- features are lost- Can anyone please help me as I need to reproduce the page more or less as it was. | August 12, 2006, 11:53 am |
| HTML problem. Converting a Webpage into Word- features are lost- Can anyone please help me as I need to reproduce the page more or less as it was. | August 12, 2006, 11:54 am |
| Converting Site to PDF: how? how hard? | August 15, 2004, 7:58 pm |
| Converting PDF documents to online slide shows. | November 27, 2004, 10:52 am |
|