Click here to get back home

Style tags -- Eeek how obese these tags make HTML!

 HomeNewsGroups | Search

comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html - discuss HTML authoring here 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Style tags -- Eeek how obese these tags make HTML! Max Power 11-08-2006
Posted by Max Power on November 8, 2006, 3:33 am
Please log in for more thread options


HTML reprocessor: how do you get rid of the obese MS-Word (normal or
filtered) HTML?

I just want all the fancy MS tags removed and replaced with basic ones, or
if applicable -- stripped entirely back to HTML 2.0, or HTML 'core' 3.2.

It was one thing when my Win95 Netscape's HTML editor bloated up my HTML 2.0
code into moderately efficient HTML 3.2 code.

The NETSCAPE Win XP HTML editor rewrote the code into moderately efficient
4.01 Transitional code -- but kept the code only slightly divergent from
HTML 3.2's core tags.

'Style' tags -- Eeek how obese these tags make HTML!
Yet, most web authoring tools (the cheap or free ones) will not help with
CSS.
'Meta' tags: I would love to clean them all up one day.

Not all my website is affected, but someday it may be.

If this idea only worked for HTML ...
http://hireme.geek.nz/wiki-at-home.html
I ACTUALLY LIKE SOME WIKIpedia MARKUP, IT IS SO not obese!
If only Wiki markup were possible in HTML, as a way to make HTML more
accessible again.
-- Tables: it would really clean them up, but not most nested tables (beyond
to nesting layers).
-- Orandanary text: some of it could be helped by Wiki markup.
-- Images: mixed bag, only useful for HTML novices and testing.
-- A new tag would probably be needed:
show/hide quoted text
-- When saving HTML files, some computational work would need to be done to
find the most space efficient markup during the saving process.

Most of my website code could go back to HTML 3.2, but my goal is conversion
to 4.01 STRICT + UTF-8 + EN-CA + no local colored tags for links...




Posted by Andy Dingley on November 8, 2006, 7:26 am
Please log in for more thread options



Max Power wrote:
show/hide quoted text

IMHE, you don't. It's easier to generate HTML without them (painful
though this is) than to sort out the execrable mess that Word produces
when left to itself.

The "Save As HTML" dialog has a few other options in there for simpler
HTML formats. They're ugly, but better than the stuff with the mso:
namespace and the bucketloads of "conditional comments".


,
Similar ThreadsPosted
style lost when html placed in td tags. February 2, 2006, 6:56 am
Meta Tags, Link Tags, other September 27, 2005, 3:29 pm
html tags and December 27, 2004, 10:02 am
W3C HTML validator ignoring tags? March 9, 2009, 12:09 pm
Why does my browser not interpret the escaped HTML tags? September 1, 2004, 12:07 pm
HTML editor that can pair up (match)
tags??? September 17, 2004, 3:29 pm
[Q] Using the POST Method with HTML Anchor Tags March 23, 2005, 2:52 pm
Enforcing Charset to UTF-32 in HTML using meta tags November 25, 2007, 1:43 pm
tool to check for missing end tags in html December 8, 2008, 2:03 am
? Storing Internal Information In An HTML Document (eg Inside Tags) February 1, 2005, 4:08 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Driving a better car - Fuelzilla.com

Cabling site for homeowners and pros alike - Cabling-Design.com

Friends:

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap
Privacy Policy