|
Posted by Leythos on April 28, 2008, 12:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options
says...
> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
> Microsoft
> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft *is
> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when you
> can comprehend simple logic ;)
Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly don't
understand how it works.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
|
Posted by Leo on April 28, 2008, 1:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Who cares? Why don't you take this crap to email?
--
Leo
"I contend that, for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity, is
like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the
handle." - Winston Churchill
> says...
>> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
>> Microsoft
>> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft *is
>> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
>> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when you
>> can comprehend simple logic ;)
>
> Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
>
> You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly don't
> understand how it works.
>
> --
> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
|
Posted by jen on April 29, 2008, 12:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options > says...
>> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
>> Microsoft
>> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
>> *is
>> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
>> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
>> you
>> can comprehend simple logic ;)
> Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
> You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
> don't
> understand how it works.
You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
-jen
|
|
Posted by Tom [Pepper] Willett on April 29, 2008, 2:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options "Non-Usenet newsgroups are possible and do occur, as private individuals or
organizations set up their own nntp servers. Examples include the newsgroups
Microsoft run to allow peer-to-peer support of their products"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup
: > says...
: >> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
: >> Microsoft
: >> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
: >> *is
: >> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
: >> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
: >> you
: >> can comprehend simple logic ;)
: > Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
: > You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
: > don't
: > understand how it works.
:
: You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
: msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
: with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
: newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
: They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
: Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
: If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
:
: -jen
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
|
|
Posted by Tom [Pepper] Willett on April 29, 2008, 2:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options "Newsgroup. A particular group within the Usenet. In October 2000, there
were more than 100,000 newsgroups. Each newsgroup is named according to a
hierarchical convention. Categories such as "rec," "comp," or "misc"
identify the general subject of the newsgroup. Additional terms are
sometimes added, uniquely defining the newsgroup within a collection of
others. Examples: comp.lang.perl.misc, rec.pets.cats,
Microsoft.public.access."
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/guide/newsgroupfaq.mspx
: > says...
: >> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
: >> Microsoft
: >> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
: >> *is
: >> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
: >> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
: >> you
: >> can comprehend simple logic ;)
: > Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
: > You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
: > don't
: > understand how it works.
:
: You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
: msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
: with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
: newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
: They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
: Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
: If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
:
: -jen
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: New threat | March 3, 2006, 8:26 am |
| Re: New threat | March 3, 2006, 8:27 am |
| Re: New threat | March 3, 2006, 12:46 pm |
| Re: New threat | March 11, 2006, 7:45 pm |
| Stress.Exe a Threat? | March 19, 2006, 8:43 am |
| New Virus Threat | May 23, 2006, 5:30 pm |
| New Virus Threat | May 23, 2006, 5:31 pm |
| how to get rid of this virus threat | July 24, 2006, 11:55 am |
| Threat Detected | October 8, 2007, 8:58 pm |
| Boot. Malmo threat | May 11, 2006, 5:20 am |
|
XML Sitemap