|
Posted by admin on July 2, 2008, 2:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I can search my keywords: cheap insurance in the evening(pst) or early
morning and I ( www.cheapinsurance.NET ) shows up on first page of
google. Then, mid morning and all afternoon I don't show up
anywhere. Then, late evening, voila! first page again. Can anybody
explain what might be happening and how I can prevent that?
|
|
Posted by canadafred on July 2, 2008, 2:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Jul 2, 2:03=A0pm, ad...@3localagents.com wrote:
=46rom my observations, in competitive keyphrase arenas such as yours,
the sequence of web sites changes quickly as the keywords get re-
crawled and reprocessed continuously. New or freshly re-spidered web
pages pop into the top spots (first 3 pages of search results) at an
alarming rate.
The days of the big Internet crawls are over. Now it is continual
crawling, ranking, comparing and then spitting out results from
searches as fast as the search engines finds webpages.
|
|
Posted by Andrew Heenan on July 2, 2008, 3:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options >I can search my keywords: cheap insurance in the evening(pst) or early
> morning and I shows up on first page of
> google. Then, mid morning and all afternoon I don't show up
> anywhere. Then, late evening, voila! first page again.
Probably you are seeing the site on different data centers. This suggests
that sooner or later, Google will settle down to all - or none.
Start by checking your linking policies - you seem to be linking to all
sorts of unrelated sites, which can be bad news.
If you buy/sell links, that may be the problem.
But you do have a problem.
--
Andrew
seo2seo.com
sick-site-syndrome.com
UK Residents:
STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff"
Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the
very poorest tell your friends about this petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/
|
|
Posted by admin on July 2, 2008, 4:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Start by checking your linking policies - you seem to be linking to all
> sorts of unrelated sites, which can be bad news.
>
Thanks for the feedback. What do you mean by the statement above?
"You seem to be linking to all sorts of unrelated sites".
|
|
Posted by Andrew Heenan on July 2, 2008, 6:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options > Thanks for the feedback. What do you mean by the statement above?
> "You seem to be linking to all sorts of unrelated sites".
Your site appears to have a fair number of links to sites that are
unrelated - ie not the same topic.
That can raise a red flag with some SEs, and does your site no favours.
You are deemed to be responsible for your outgoing links, and you therefore
need to choose carefully who you link to.
Any links to sites that are not of interest to your visitors should be
reviewed, and if in doubt, deleted.
Links to designers, SEOs and other hangers-on who 'expect' a link, should
always be 'nofollow' links (if at all).
Links to related quality sites, on the other hand, can help your site.
--
Andrew
seo2seo.com
sick-site-syndrome.com
UK Residents:
STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff"
Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the
very poorest tell your friends about this petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | First time I see this in Google results! | August 26, 2006, 2:16 pm |
| Time for deep crawl results to show up | February 21, 2005, 4:33 pm |
| Real time search | January 16, 2005, 6:04 pm |
| My site is every time removed from search engines. | February 28, 2006, 1:17 pm |
| Time Warner's AOL May Dump Google Search Engine, Use Microsoft | September 15, 2005, 6:23 pm |
| Edited (shortened) repost -- search-engines, and search-results which may read like a 'crystal ball.' | February 11, 2005, 5:16 pm |
| Google Dsektop Search defects: visited link color, search results sort inconsistency | January 11, 2005, 4:43 am |
| Search-engine strategies-- search results which may be like a 'crystal-ball' | February 22, 2005, 4:51 pm |
| Is It Possible to Get More Than 20 Search Results Per Page With dmoz Search? | December 20, 2007, 2:29 am |
| Search Results | February 28, 2006, 7:43 pm |
|