|
Posted by Peter Billam on June 16, 2005, 9:38 am
Please log in for more thread options
Peter Billam wrote:
> Greetings. I've just installed SGI-FAM-1.002 (1997) and couldn't help
> noticing that prerequisites File-PathConvert, which is now deprecated...
> [snip]
> I emailed the author jglick@sig.bsh.com to ask if there were any
> plans for a version of SGI::FAM to take advantage of the bundled
> Cwd.pm and File::Spec, but sendmail reported
> Deferred: Connection timed out with sig.bsh.com
Jim Keenan wrote:
>
> That's not surprising. As you reported SGI::FAM hasn't been updated
> since 1997. Is it any wonder that its author can no longer be reached
> at that e-mail address?
Indeed not :-) , but I thought it correct procedure to try.
>> I think SGI::FAM only uses File-PathConvert in one line,
>> in sub abspath, in lib/SGI/FAM.pm.
> Okay, then for your own purposes you should create a version of
> SGI::FAM which implements the suggestions made re Cwd and File::Spec.
>
>> Possibly (see http://ayesha.phys.virginia.edu/~bryan/projects/famids/ )
>> it could also be nice to stop SGI::FAM testing for /etc/fam.conf,
>> because then it could work seamlessly with Gamin (otherwise very
>> python-biased :-( ) but I can't see where it does that ...
> Have you tried contacting the 'bryan' who appears to be the author of
> that script?
I just installed File-PathConvert. I wouldn't really want to put
any work into this if I can't then contribute the result to CPAN.
>> What's the right thing to do here ?
>> Is there a procedure for putting modules up for adoption ?
>
> IMHO, the Perl community hasn't developed a good procedure for this
> and a variety of problems that are bound to occur more frequently
> as CPAN ages. [snip] I don't know whether we have ever transferred
> maintenance of a module by a noncontactable author.
>
> Speaking personally, I wouldn't mind seeing a system whereby CPAN would
> annually try to verify the validity of every author's e-mail address,
> and then post a listing of "noncontactable" authors. If after, say,
> three months, the author has not materialized, then any of that
> author's modules which have not received a new version in, say,
> two years would be put up for "bid" for new maintenance.
I'll second that.
Regards, Peter
--
Peter Billam, DPIWE/CIT/Servers, hbt/lnd/l8, 6233 3061
|