Click here to get back home

Real advantages in using HTML4 strict vs XHTML Translational?

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Real advantages in using HTML4 strict vs XHTML Translational? howa 11-15-2007
Posted by howa on November 15, 2007, 12:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Besides

1. matter of taste
2. XHTML content-type issue, i.e. trigger IE quirk mode if send using
the correct xml content type


Are there any real advantage that can differentiates these two?

Similar ThreadsPosted
html4/strict.dtd & IE/firefox problem April 21, 2005, 9:34 am
HTML4.01 STRICT and hyperlinks with target October 8, 2008, 4:26 am
Re: HTML4.01 STRICT and hyperlinks with target October 8, 2008, 5:14 pm
Re: Different height under HTML4 and XHTML March 5, 2008, 12:03 am
Re: Different height under HTML4 and XHTML March 5, 2008, 2:29 pm
Is Html4.01 spec(http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/) downly compatible to older editions such like Html4.0? April 20, 2005, 3:26 am
utf-8 and xhtml 1.0 strict October 28, 2004, 7:26 am
xhtml vs html 4 strict May 21, 2005, 5:23 pm
Strict XHTML and div question July 14, 2005, 7:07 pm
XHTML 1.0 Strict and the Apostrophe February 15, 2008, 11:12 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap