Click here to get back home

Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.lang.perl.misc    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality szr 06-01-2008
Posted by szr on June 1, 2008, 4:24 am
Please log in for more thread options
Peter Duniho wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>> But the subthread Lew commente don was about Perl and Unix. That is
>>> clearly off topic.
>>
>> I agree with and understand what you are saying in general, but
>> still, isn't it possible that were are people in the java group (and
>> others) who might of been following the thread, only to discover
>> (probably not right away) that someone decided to remove the group
>> they were reading the thread from? I know I would not like that,
>> even if it wasn't on topic at the branch.
>
> All due respect, I don't really care if those people find the thread
> gone. And no one should.

I prefer to be considerate of others.

> Each individual person has a wide variety of interests. A thread
> that is off-topic in a newsgroup may in fact be concerning a topic of
> interest for someone who just happened to be reading that newsgroup.

Well if a thread has absolutely no relation to a group, then yes,
cross-posting to said group is inappropiate, and setting follow ups may
well be warrented. But when there is some relation, sometimes it may be
better to mark it as [OT] i nthe subject line, a practice that is
sometimes seen, and seems to suffice.

> What if someone cross-posted a thread about motorcycle racing in the
> Perl newsgroup as well as an actual motorcycle racing newsgroup?

You are comparing apples and oranges now; sure, if you post about
motorcycles (to use your example) it would be wildly off topic, but the
thread in question was relating to programming (the naming of functions
and such) in general.

> Does that justify the thread continuing to be cross-posted to the Perl
> newsgroup? No, of course not.

but who decides this? And why does said individual get to decide for
everyone?

> So please. Quit trying to justify a thread being cross-posted to a
> newsgroup that you aren't even reading

You do not know what groups I read. And I am not attempting to justify
cross posting at all. Rather I am arguing against deciding for a whole
news group when a thread should be discontinued.

--
szr



Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality May 10, 2008, 9:33 am
Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality May 29, 2008, 8:31 pm
Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality July 20, 2008, 1:36 pm
Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality July 22, 2008, 12:29 pm
Quality of rand() April 11, 2008, 1:44 pm
Fast and high-quality Web Site Creation December 12, 2004, 3:20 am
Accessing TestDirector for Quality Center OTA API using Perl May 3, 2006, 3:53 pm
Xah's Edu Corner: Examples of Quality Technical Writing December 5, 2005, 8:55 pm
Boost your business with Quality Web & Design Services at Bargain Prices! January 17, 2008, 9:53 am
Code Quality and examples from the Perl source code April 11, 2006, 10:22 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap