Click here to get back home

Re: Rock maps revise martian history

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 alt.sci.planetary    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Re: Rock maps revise martian history David Williams 04-26-2006
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by David Williams on April 26, 2006, 10:53 am
Please log in for more thread options
-> Just wondering.... (Mars/ Earth/ water questions..) From a
-> geological viewpoint there would seem to have been a big increase in
-> the amount of water on the Earth's surface at the same time as the
-> mantle broke through the crust <Death of the Dinos> <bone beds>
<LIPS>

Many remains of ancient creatures are found in areas that were seas
then, but are dry land now, for example the large area of North America
just east of the Rockies. There was obviously plenty of water back
then. There's no reason to think that the quantity has increased much
since.

What's wrong with the comet theory? Really, the water on the Earth is
just a thin film that doesn't even completely cover the surface. Less
than one thousandth of the mass of the Earth consists of water. It
seems perfectly plausible to me that impacts by icy comets after the
Earth had cooled enough to allow liquid water on the surface could have
brought all the water that we now have.

dow

Posted by Jonathan Silverlight on April 26, 2006, 5:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>-> Just wondering.... (Mars/ Earth/ water questions..) From a
>-> geological viewpoint there would seem to have been a big increase in
>-> the amount of water on the Earth's surface at the same time as the
>-> mantle broke through the crust <Death of the Dinos> <bone beds>
><LIPS>
>
>Many remains of ancient creatures are found in areas that were seas
>then, but are dry land now, for example the large area of North America
>just east of the Rockies. There was obviously plenty of water back
>then. There's no reason to think that the quantity has increased much
>since.
>
>What's wrong with the comet theory? Really, the water on the Earth is
>just a thin film that doesn't even completely cover the surface. Less
>than one thousandth of the mass of the Earth consists of water. It
>seems perfectly plausible to me that impacts by icy comets after the
>Earth had cooled enough to allow liquid water on the surface could have
>brought all the water that we now have.
>

I posted something last month in reply to one of don findlay's posts,
saying that there is good evidence that water may be present throughout
the mantle and even in the core. Here's another article that says there
may be as much as 0.4 percent <http://www.ldolphin.org/deepwaters.html>
That thin film is just the visible part of a huge reservoir.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Rock maps revise martian history April 23, 2006, 9:35 pm
Re: Rock maps revise martian history April 26, 2006, 10:44 am
NASA Maps the Moon With Google September 18, 2007, 9:30 pm
SMART-1 Maps Its Own Impact Site August 31, 2006, 1:23 pm
Was There Life on Mars? Shiny Rock Coating May Hold the Answer June 30, 2006, 4:09 pm
Cassini 'Cat Scan' Maps Clumps in Saturn's Rings May 22, 2007, 5:22 pm
Interesting Saturn 1B History January 16, 2007, 10:48 am
Station Keeping History of Hayabusa at Itokawa September 29, 2005, 8:57 am
2005 science breakthrough: Revising Earth's early history December 22, 2005, 10:19 pm
Floating Pile of Rubble a Pristine Record of Solar System's History (Itokawa) June 1, 2006, 4:41 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap