|
Posted by Eric Chomko on September 10, 2007, 2:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Sep 7, 3:53 pm, ra...@darkstar.arc.nasa.gov (Kathy Rages) wrote:
>
> >Anyway, I find it difficult to escape the conclusion that the timing
> >wasn't the only mission design feature that was preserved from the more
> >ambitious plans - I mean, for spacecraft for a four-year long mission,
> >their core functions seem remarkably intact after 30 years!
>
> Indeed.
>
> "Why is there a Reed-Salomon encoder on this spacecraft?"
> "Uh, uh, uh . . . the rain in Spain! Yes! It might be raining in
> Spain (or Australia, or even Goldstone) during Jupiter encounter. And
> that would do terrible things to the downlink S/N. So that's why we
> need it."
>
> As I recall, this was at least part of the reason actually given for
> retaining it.
That's Reed-Solomon. I know how to spell it but couldn't tell you how
it works. :)
Eric
>
> --
> Kathy Rages
|