|
Posted by Ken S. Tucker on May 28, 2008, 6:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On May 28, 3:53 pm, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
> On 05/28/2008 1:49 PM, dynam...@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:
>
> -> Dave, it's taken since May 21st, (1 week) just for you to
> -> discover Venus has NO PLATE TECTONICS!!!
> -> It will take months for you to figure out WHY NOT!!!
Explain that.
Ken
PS: You Old Fart.
> Actually, I don't consider it proven that Venus has no plate tectonics. All the
> data could be accounted for if there are small plates that don't last very
> long. That would account for the paucity of craters and their random
> distribution, without invoking a global melt-down.
>
> But the fact remains, despite your attempts to mask it, that Venus is utterly
> irrelevant to your earthquake hypothesis. It's a red herring.
>
> Get back to earthquakes, and quit being tedious.
>
> dow
| 
XML Sitemap