Click here to get back home

Question on an 80/20 3 Year ARM

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 alt.org.natl-assn-mortgage-brokers    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Question on an 80/20 3 Year ARM Gerry 04-24-2005
Posted by Gerry on April 24, 2005, 1:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options


I have a few questions on what options I might have if any.

I recently purchased a new build and took an 80/20 interest only 3 year
ARM. Having previously always bought via VA, I did not fully consider the
ramifications of the 20 portion being a 'personal line of credit' in terms
of the 'revolving credit' aspect of the deal.

I made an addtional payment of $1000 on the 20% portion of the loan on the
first payment and it was a real eye opener to see that the 'principal' was
not reduced by $1000 as it had the finance charge added like a credit
card.The 20% portion is also subject to prime rate fluctuations.

I had previously talked to the bank about making addtional payments on
principal only and got a story about how I had a 3-5 day period around the
posting date when I could do that. I will see them again for a
clarification but I got the impression that if I made additional payments
outside that window, I would not get 'full credit' for those payments.

Current balance on the 20 is 67885 on a 6.25 APR.There are 31 days in the
billing cycle.

My questions are:

1) Is there any payment frequency/amount option(s) which would minimize the
finance charge?

2) Any other options that would reduce or eliminate the revolving credit
aspect of this, i.e re-financing the 20% portion only or whatever?

Thanks in advance.

Gerry
datapro01@yahoo.com



Posted by Jeff Strickland on April 24, 2005, 1:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options



>I have a few questions on what options I might have if any.
>
> I recently purchased a new build and took an 80/20 interest only 3 year
> ARM. Having previously always bought via VA, I did not fully consider the
> ramifications of the 20 portion being a 'personal line of credit' in terms
> of the 'revolving credit' aspect of the deal.
>

The 20 is not, or it isn't in my state, a personal line of credit or
revovling credit. It is a full on mortgage secured by a lien on the
property. The reason you take this kind of loan is that you do not want to
take PMI (private mortgage insurance) with your 100% loan. The PMI is a
feature of the VA loan, but these days the VA loans are not very competitive
and they aren't large enough for many new home purchase transactions.




> I made an addtional payment of $1000 on the 20% portion of the loan on the
> first payment and it was a real eye opener to see that the 'principal' was
> not reduced by $1000 as it had the finance charge added like a credit
> card.The 20% portion is also subject to prime rate fluctuations.
>

Well, of course. If you pay $1000, the first thing the lender will take is
the interest that is due, the remainder will go towards the principle. This
is true of any mortgage loan, with the exception of the impounds that will
be taken if there are any impounds - impounds will be set aside before the
principle is reduced.



> I had previously talked to the bank about making addtional payments on
> principal only and got a story about how I had a 3-5 day period around the
> posting date when I could do that. I will see them again for a
> clarification but I got the impression that if I made additional payments
> outside that window, I would not get 'full credit' for those payments.
>

You didn't tell us what the loan amount was or the rate, but if we made some
simple asumptions, yo could tailor the numbers to fit your particular
scenario.

Let's assume the 2nd is for 50,000. I haven't got my loan caluclator handy,
but let's also assume the interest rate is 7.5%, the interest due on the
note would be 312.50 (50,000 x .0750 = 3750 / 12 = 312.50). This means that
the first 312.50 of your payment will go to service the interest, the
remainder will service the principle. Many 2nd's are a Home Equity Line of
Credit (HELOC) that lets you make interest only payments for the first 10
years. If you had a statement with a Payment Due of 312.50, then this is the
interest that the bank demands you pay them. Any additional monies you pay
at the time of payment will go to service the principle. The subesquent
payments will be recalculated on the remaining principle.

If you made additional payments outside of the window, those payments would
not go to the principle in their entirety, the bank would service some of
the interest that has become due shine the last payment. Your best strategy
is to make additional payments at the time of your payment that is currently
due.




> Current balance on the 20 is 67885 on a 6.25 APR.There are 31 days in the
> billing cycle.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1) Is there any payment frequency/amount option(s) which would minimize
> the
> finance charge?
>
> 2) Any other options that would reduce or eliminate the revolving credit
> aspect of this, i.e re-financing the 20% portion only or whatever?
>

I am not sure what the "revolving credit" aspect is that you keep talking
about. If you have a HELOC, then perhaps that is the revolving quality that
you are talking about. If you have a HELOC, then it mose certainly does have
a revolving quality. That is, as you repay the principle, that principle can
be used again during the first 10 years of the loan.

If you took out a $70,000 note for 6.25%, then you could calculate your
payment by multiplying the principle by the rate, and dividing the result by
12. This may vary a small amount due to the term of any particular billing
period, but you should be pretty close. Using this formula, your payment
should be roughly $365.00. If you made a payment of $1000, then your
principle should be reduced next month by $635, so your next payment should
be based on $67,885 - $635 = $67,250. The next payment should be $350, so
the same $1000 you send in should reduce the outstanding principle by $650,
and so on.

Since in this scenario, you will have reduced the principle by $1285 over
two payment cycles, then you will have an available balance of this amount,
plus any previous principle reductions. This means that you can used
mortgage dollars to do landscaping work or buy the big screen, and transfer
the interest from your credit card to your mortgage. The reason you might
want to do this is that mortgage interest is tax deducatble, credit card
interest is not. And, mortgage interest is lower so you save on several
fronts. You have the repaid principle available to you for furture spending
for a period of 10 years, after 10 years has gone by, you have 15 years to
repay any outstanding balance.

Another benefit of what you did is you avoid the PMI. PMI premiums are not
tax deductable but mortgage interest is. If you took out a 100% loan and
carried PMI, the payment would be higher than the payment on the 80/20, and
the interest you pay on the 20% is tax deducatble whereas the payment to the
PMI has no tax advantage.

So, the short answer to your question is, pay more than the bank asks for,
and include the overpayment in the payment that is due. This will reduce
your outstanding balance by the difference in what is due and what you paid
them. The subsequent payments will be recalculated on the lower principal
balance.






Posted by Buck on April 24, 2005, 8:12 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Jeff:


I certainly appreciate your detailed answer.I will try to explain a bit
more throughly what I am looking at.

The 20% portion of the loan is a 'personal credit line' based on
revolving credit. I fully understand what you have explained in terms of
deductibility on mortgage interest payments.

While I admit I apparently didn't dig deep enough on the ramifications
of this loan, this is what threw us.

The loan was initially for $65,000 at 6.00%

We know that the rate on this can float from month to month. It opened
at 6%

The first invoice we received was for a payment of $228.33.
I don't know why that due amount was lower than expected. I will ask
them but feel it might have something to do with our closing date (not a
full 31 day billing cycle).

In any rate, a few days before due date we paid the amount due ($228.33)
PLUS an additional $1000, fully expecting that THAT $1000 would be
subtracted from the principal.

We were really shocked to see our latest statement.

Here are the numbers.
APR went to 6.25% (I have to set up automatic transfer to get a 1/4 pt
reduction on the APR.....ok fine

Total Previous Balance - $68,728.33 (They added the finance charge to
the previously due principal)

Payments - $1228.83

Finance Charge $355.54

Total New Balance - $67,855.54

APR - 6.25%


We expected the additional $1000 (it was provided as a second payment
labled 'for principal only') to be substracted from the principal. In a
sense it was.

$68.728.33
- $1228.33
-----------
$67,500.00

But then they calculated the 6.25 APR monthly interest.

67,500 x .0625 = $4218.75/12 = $351.56

and added the finance charge (in my case) $ 355.54 to the principal and
my 'new balance' is now $67,855.54


That's why I keep calling it revolving credit. Its just like a credit
card and frankly, we didn't expect that.

Obviously the only way you keep from taking a bath with this type of
loan is pay it off. But we are not in a position to do that.

We can afford the payments, have excellent credit and no debt at all
aside from the house.

In your opinion do you think we might have any options with this re
refinancing just this 20% part or pay it off with another more
conventional loan?

Or is that difficult with this type of 'second mortgage'.

Any other options?

Once again, many thanks in advance for your insight.

Gerry






>
>>I have a few questions on what options I might have if any.
>>
>> I recently purchased a new build and took an 80/20 interest only 3
>> year ARM. Having previously always bought via VA, I did not fully
>> consider the ramifications of the 20 portion being a 'personal line
>> of credit' in terms of the 'revolving credit' aspect of the deal.
>>
>
> The 20 is not, or it isn't in my state, a personal line of credit or
> revovling credit. It is a full on mortgage secured by a lien on the
> property. The reason you take this kind of loan is that you do not
> want to take PMI (private mortgage insurance) with your 100% loan. The
> PMI is a feature of the VA loan, but these days the VA loans are not
> very competitive and they aren't large enough for many new home
> purchase transactions.
>
>
>
>
>> I made an addtional payment of $1000 on the 20% portion of the loan
>> on the first payment and it was a real eye opener to see that the
>> 'principal' was not reduced by $1000 as it had the finance charge
>> added like a credit card.The 20% portion is also subject to prime
>> rate fluctuations.
>>
>
> Well, of course. If you pay $1000, the first thing the lender will
> take is the interest that is due, the remainder will go towards the
> principle. This is true of any mortgage loan, with the exception of
> the impounds that will be taken if there are any impounds - impounds
> will be set aside before the principle is reduced.
>
>
>
>> I had previously talked to the bank about making addtional payments
>> on principal only and got a story about how I had a 3-5 day period
>> around the posting date when I could do that. I will see them again
>> for a clarification but I got the impression that if I made
>> additional payments outside that window, I would not get 'full
>> credit' for those payments.
>>
>
> You didn't tell us what the loan amount was or the rate, but if we
> made some simple asumptions, yo could tailor the numbers to fit your
> particular scenario.
>
> Let's assume the 2nd is for 50,000. I haven't got my loan caluclator
> handy, but let's also assume the interest rate is 7.5%, the interest
> due on the note would be 312.50 (50,000 x .0750 = 3750 / 12 = 312.50).
> This means that the first 312.50 of your payment will go to service
> the interest, the remainder will service the principle. Many 2nd's are
> a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) that lets you make interest only
> payments for the first 10 years. If you had a statement with a Payment
> Due of 312.50, then this is the interest that the bank demands you pay
> them. Any additional monies you pay at the time of payment will go to
> service the principle. The subesquent payments will be recalculated on
> the remaining principle.
>
> If you made additional payments outside of the window, those payments
> would not go to the principle in their entirety, the bank would
> service some of the interest that has become due shine the last
> payment. Your best strategy is to make additional payments at the time
> of your payment that is currently due.
>
>
>
>
>> Current balance on the 20 is 67885 on a 6.25 APR.There are 31 days in
>> the billing cycle.
>>
>> My questions are:
>>
>> 1) Is there any payment frequency/amount option(s) which would
>> minimize the
>> finance charge?
>>
>> 2) Any other options that would reduce or eliminate the revolving
>> credit aspect of this, i.e re-financing the 20% portion only or
>> whatever?
>>
>
> I am not sure what the "revolving credit" aspect is that you keep
> talking about. If you have a HELOC, then perhaps that is the revolving
> quality that you are talking about. If you have a HELOC, then it mose
> certainly does have a revolving quality. That is, as you repay the
> principle, that principle can be used again during the first 10 years
> of the loan.
>
> If you took out a $70,000 note for 6.25%, then you could calculate
> your payment by multiplying the principle by the rate, and dividing
> the result by 12. This may vary a small amount due to the term of any
> particular billing period, but you should be pretty close. Using this
> formula, your payment should be roughly $365.00. If you made a payment
> of $1000, then your principle should be reduced next month by $635, so
> your next payment should be based on $67,885 - $635 = $67,250. The
> next payment should be $350, so the same $1000 you send in should
> reduce the outstanding principle by $650, and so on.
>
> Since in this scenario, you will have reduced the principle by $1285
> over two payment cycles, then you will have an available balance of
> this amount, plus any previous principle reductions. This means that
> you can used mortgage dollars to do landscaping work or buy the big
> screen, and transfer the interest from your credit card to your
> mortgage. The reason you might want to do this is that mortgage
> interest is tax deducatble, credit card interest is not. And, mortgage
> interest is lower so you save on several fronts. You have the repaid
> principle available to you for furture spending for a period of 10
> years, after 10 years has gone by, you have 15 years to repay any
> outstanding balance.
>
> Another benefit of what you did is you avoid the PMI. PMI premiums are
> not tax deductable but mortgage interest is. If you took out a 100%
> loan and carried PMI, the payment would be higher than the payment on
> the 80/20, and the interest you pay on the 20% is tax deducatble
> whereas the payment to the PMI has no tax advantage.
>
> So, the short answer to your question is, pay more than the bank asks
> for, and include the overpayment in the payment that is due. This will
> reduce your outstanding balance by the difference in what is due and
> what you paid them. The subsequent payments will be recalculated on
> the lower principal balance.
>
>
>
>



Posted by Jeff Strickland on April 24, 2005, 7:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options



> Jeff:
>
>
> I certainly appreciate your detailed answer.I will try to explain a bit
> more throughly what I am looking at.
>
> The 20% portion of the loan is a 'personal credit line' based on
> revolving credit. I fully understand what you have explained in terms of
> deductibility on mortgage interest payments.
>
> While I admit I apparently didn't dig deep enough on the ramifications
> of this loan, this is what threw us.
>
> The loan was initially for $65,000 at 6.00%
>
> We know that the rate on this can float from month to month. It opened
> at 6%
>


Based on what you have said so far, you have a Home Equity Line of Credit.
It is based on Prime + a margin, however the Prime hasn't changed .625, it
has changed .500 or .750, depending on when you got it, but it has not
changed .625, AND your margin hasn't changed at all.

I am not in the position to argue the point that you have a personal loan or
an Equity Line, but as a lender I can assure you that I have never extended
a personal line in your circumstance, in all instances, I would extend a
Home Equity Line of Credit.

By extending an Equity Line, then I can put my name on title as a loss payee
in the event you default on the loan. If I extend a Personal Line, then I am
not sure I can get on title, and my interest is unsecured - meaning that I
would have difficulty collecting on my interest if you defaulted. I might
still lend money, but the rate wil be higher to protect my interests. Given
the rate quote that you gave us, I can't help but think you have a HELOC and
not a personal line.



> The first invoice we received was for a payment of $228.33.
> I don't know why that due amount was lower than expected. I will ask
> them but feel it might have something to do with our closing date (not a
> full 31 day billing cycle).
>

Well, your 1st trust deed has its payment due on the 1st of the month, your
2nd trust deed can be due on any day of the month. When your loan closed,
the 1st had an interest charge that brough the interest due up to the 30th
of the current month, and you interest began accruing on the 1st of the
following month, and was due for you to make a payment on the 1st of the
subsequent month, and on the 1st of each month thereafter. The 2nd can be
due to be paid on any day, the 5th or the 15th for example. Since your first
payment due might not have been a full month, it would be short relative to
the other months.





> In any rate, a few days before due date we paid the amount due ($228.33)
> PLUS an additional $1000, fully expecting that THAT $1000 would be
> subtracted from the principal.
>
> We were really shocked to see our latest statement.
>

OK, now we are getting to concrete facts.

You paid 228 PLUS 1000? If so, then the 228 should have serviced the
interest due and the extra grand should have goe to reduce the outstanding
principle. If you started with a principle balance of 70,000, then yo should
have gone to a new balance of 69,000.

Bear with me as I digest this ...




> Here are the numbers.
> APR went to 6.25% (I have to set up automatic transfer to get a 1/4 pt
> reduction on the APR.....ok fine
>
> Total Previous Balance - $68,728.33 (They added the finance charge to
> the previously due principal)
>
> Payments - $1228.83
>
> Finance Charge $355.54
>
> Total New Balance - $67,855.54
>
> APR - 6.25%
>
>

OK, the new Finance Charge is the new interest.

Logic - which does not always apply in banking - says that they should have
taken the orignial Amount Due and subtracted $1000, then applied the Finance
Charge to the remaining amount, especially if you paid the Amount Due before
the Due Date. So, you receive a bill that has a Due Date of March 30 <or
whatever>. You make the payment, and ADD $1000. The next billing should be
for the principle minus $1000, times the interest per day for the number of
days in the billing period. The payments you send in should service the
interest due first, then subtract any over payment from the principle. The
next payment should look at the balance of the previous period, and multiply
by the interest due per day by the number of days.

What the bank says is that you had a payment due, you made it but in the
mean time the Interest Clock continued to click. The next biling should be
for the number of days at the old balance, plus the number of days at the
new balance.

I think I understand your question, why did they deduct what appears to be
"unearned interest" from the overpayment that you wanted to apply to the
principle? This is a good question. If you continue tooverpay $1000 extra
for each month, then this loan (the 2nd Trust Deed) should be retired in 70
months. If you made a fixed payment each month, say $1350, then the logic
says your pricniple repayment should accelerate because the payments remain
the same but the interest due should be going down.


> We expected the additional $1000 (it was provided as a second payment
> labled 'for principal only') to be substracted from the principal. In a
> sense it was.
>
> $68.728.33
> - $1228.33
> -----------
> $67,500.00
>
> But then they calculated the 6.25 APR monthly interest.
>
> 67,500 x .0625 = $4218.75/12 = $351.56
>

The math here works out correctly, the equation you gave does indeed work
out to a solution of $351.62. They will add the new Finance Charge to the
Previous Balance, then subtract the payment.

Next month, the Fincance Charge will be recalculated on the same formula ...


> and added the finance charge (in my case) $ 355.54 to the principal and
> my 'new balance' is now $67,855.54
>
>
> That's why I keep calling it revolving credit. Its just like a credit
> card and frankly, we didn't expect that.
>

One thing that I have not calculated, and it appears you might not
understand, is that interest due is calculated and collected in arrears.

The deffinition of arrears is subtle but significant.

When you make a car loan payment, for example, on the 1st of the month, you
are paying for the NEXT MONTH's use of the money (interest). When you make a
Mortgage Loan payment your paymen tof for the PRIOR MONTH's use of the
money.

If your loan balance is 70,000, then the payment at 6.25% is (interest only)
is $364.58. If you overpay, the balance will drop, but the next payment will
look back to the previous month and calculate the interest due for the next
30 days, and you get a bill.

However, from your description, it looks like they took the current interest
and applied the payment, then took the next interest and took it from the
$1000, then calculated new interest on monies they already collected.

One of us is not understanding what has happened, because it is clearly
illegal if it happened the way I just outlined.




> Obviously the only way you keep from taking a bath with this type of
> loan is pay it off. But we are not in a position to do that.
>

Most people aren't. Don't stress about this.





> We can afford the payments, have excellent credit and no debt at all
> aside from the house.
>
> In your opinion do you think we might have any options with this re
> refinancing just this 20% part or pay it off with another more
> conventional loan?
>

You can certainly refinance the loan(s) into a single 1st Trust Deed. All
that is needed is that you attain 12 months of seasoning, the loan has to be
12 months old to use a new appraised value, but that new value has to be
enough to let you take a new loan and remain below 80% Loan to Value.

Using round numbers, you have a 2nd Trust Deed of $70,000. This gives a
Sales Price of $350,000 if 20% LTV. To refi your current 1st and 2nd into a
new loan, you need an appraised value of about $438,000 or better. (350,000
/ .080 = 437,500) This will give you a new 1st that will pay the 2nd off. If
I could get an appraised value on your house of $450,000, I could give you a
new loan of $360,000 and pay all of your closing costs. This means that you
would have no out of pocket costs, except the Appraiser's Fee.

Send me your full name and address off line, and I can check public records
and tell you of there is a snowball's chance in Hell of getting a $450,000
value.

Jeff Strickland
Jeff@citymortgage.net
jstrickland@ez2.net

City Mortgage Services
SanDiego, CA.




> Or is that difficult with this type of 'second mortgage'.
>
> Any other options?
>
> Once again, many thanks in advance for your insight.
>
> Gerry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>I have a few questions on what options I might have if any.
>>>
>>> I recently purchased a new build and took an 80/20 interest only 3
>>> year ARM. Having previously always bought via VA, I did not fully
>>> consider the ramifications of the 20 portion being a 'personal line
>>> of credit' in terms of the 'revolving credit' aspect of the deal.
>>>
>>
>> The 20 is not, or it isn't in my state, a personal line of credit or
>> revovling credit. It is a full on mortgage secured by a lien on the
>> property. The reason you take this kind of loan is that you do not
>> want to take PMI (private mortgage insurance) with your 100% loan. The
>> PMI is a feature of the VA loan, but these days the VA loans are not
>> very competitive and they aren't large enough for many new home
>> purchase transactions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I made an addtional payment of $1000 on the 20% portion of the loan
>>> on the first payment and it was a real eye opener to see that the
>>> 'principal' was not reduced by $1000 as it had the finance charge
>>> added like a credit card.The 20% portion is also subject to prime
>>> rate fluctuations.
>>>
>>
>> Well, of course. If you pay $1000, the first thing the lender will
>> take is the interest that is due, the remainder will go towards the
>> principle. This is true of any mortgage loan, with the exception of
>> the impounds that will be taken if there are any impounds - impounds
>> will be set aside before the principle is reduced.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I had previously talked to the bank about making addtional payments
>>> on principal only and got a story about how I had a 3-5 day period
>>> around the posting date when I could do that. I will see them again
>>> for a clarification but I got the impression that if I made
>>> additional payments outside that window, I would not get 'full
>>> credit' for those payments.
>>>
>>
>> You didn't tell us what the loan amount was or the rate, but if we
>> made some simple asumptions, yo could tailor the numbers to fit your
>> particular scenario.
>>
>> Let's assume the 2nd is for 50,000. I haven't got my loan caluclator
>> handy, but let's also assume the interest rate is 7.5%, the interest
>> due on the note would be 312.50 (50,000 x .0750 = 3750 / 12 = 312.50).
>> This means that the first 312.50 of your payment will go to service
>> the interest, the remainder will service the principle. Many 2nd's are
>> a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) that lets you make interest only
>> payments for the first 10 years. If you had a statement with a Payment
>> Due of 312.50, then this is the interest that the bank demands you pay
>> them. Any additional monies you pay at the time of payment will go to
>> service the principle. The subesquent payments will be recalculated on
>> the remaining principle.
>>
>> If you made additional payments outside of the window, those payments
>> would not go to the principle in their entirety, the bank would
>> service some of the interest that has become due shine the last
>> payment. Your best strategy is to make additional payments at the time
>> of your payment that is currently due.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Current balance on the 20 is 67885 on a 6.25 APR.There are 31 days in
>>> the billing cycle.
>>>
>>> My questions are:
>>>
>>> 1) Is there any payment frequency/amount option(s) which would
>>> minimize the
>>> finance charge?
>>>
>>> 2) Any other options that would reduce or eliminate the revolving
>>> credit aspect of this, i.e re-financing the 20% portion only or
>>> whatever?
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure what the "revolving credit" aspect is that you keep
>> talking about. If you have a HELOC, then perhaps that is the revolving
>> quality that you are talking about. If you have a HELOC, then it mose
>> certainly does have a revolving quality. That is, as you repay the
>> principle, that principle can be used again during the first 10 years
>> of the loan.
>>
>> If you took out a $70,000 note for 6.25%, then you could calculate
>> your payment by multiplying the principle by the rate, and dividing
>> the result by 12. This may vary a small amount due to the term of any
>> particular billing period, but you should be pretty close. Using this
>> formula, your payment should be roughly $365.00. If you made a payment
>> of $1000, then your principle should be reduced next month by $635, so
>> your next payment should be based on $67,885 - $635 = $67,250. The
>> next payment should be $350, so the same $1000 you send in should
>> reduce the outstanding principle by $650, and so on.
>>
>> Since in this scenario, you will have reduced the principle by $1285
>> over two payment cycles, then you will have an available balance of
>> this amount, plus any previous principle reductions. This means that
>> you can used mortgage dollars to do landscaping work or buy the big
>> screen, and transfer the interest from your credit card to your
>> mortgage. The reason you might want to do this is that mortgage
>> interest is tax deducatble, credit card interest is not. And, mortgage
>> interest is lower so you save on several fronts. You have the repaid
>> principle available to you for furture spending for a period of 10
>> years, after 10 years has gone by, you have 15 years to repay any
>> outstanding balance.
>>
>> Another benefit of what you did is you avoid the PMI. PMI premiums are
>> not tax deductable but mortgage interest is. If you took out a 100%
>> loan and carried PMI, the payment would be higher than the payment on
>> the 80/20, and the interest you pay on the 20% is tax deducatble
>> whereas the payment to the PMI has no tax advantage.
>>
>> So, the short answer to your question is, pay more than the bank asks
>> for, and include the overpayment in the payment that is due. This will
>> reduce your outstanding balance by the difference in what is due and
>> what you paid them. The subsequent payments will be recalculated on
>> the lower principal balance.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



Posted by Joel Britt on April 24, 2005, 11:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options


To the original poster:

Your current mortgage situation is not uncommon. Everyday, all over the
country, people just like you will an 80/20 to avoid mortgage insurance.
Brokers, like myself and Jeff, will tell people that it is a good idea and
it is, but there are alternatives.

Other than the terms being somewhat confusing do to the fact that it is a
variable rate that can increase at anytime with no warning, you need to take
into account how it will also affect your credit score. At this point, you
have a $69,000 credit line which is essentially maxed out. If you run your
credit in 6 months, you will find that your scores will have probably
dropped by atleast 40 points or more. Thats not good.

If you can afford to pay an additional $1000 per month to apply toward your
principle you might be better off refinancing the home and making a higher
payment at a fixed rate. I would recommend a 95% rate/term refi with TAMI -
Tax Advantage Mortgage Insurance. TAMI is a PMI alternative where instead
of paying PMI, you would pay a slightly higher interest rate, that way the
additional monies you pay each year are still tax deductible.

The bottom line is, you obviously don't like the HELOC you have - guess
what, it's only going to get worse. The fed raises that rate .25% everytime
it increases it, and the rumor is that it may raise 2 more times this year.
Get out of it. Talk to Jeff, he will probably agree with me.

Joel Britt
NationOne Mortgage
Columbus, Ohio


>
>> Jeff:
>>
>>
>> I certainly appreciate your detailed answer.I will try to explain a bit
>> more throughly what I am looking at.
>>
>> The 20% portion of the loan is a 'personal credit line' based on
>> revolving credit. I fully understand what you have explained in terms of
>> deductibility on mortgage interest payments.
>>
>> While I admit I apparently didn't dig deep enough on the ramifications
>> of this loan, this is what threw us.
>>
>> The loan was initially for $65,000 at 6.00%
>>
>> We know that the rate on this can float from month to month. It opened
>> at 6%
>>
>
>
> Based on what you have said so far, you have a Home Equity Line of Credit.
> It is based on Prime + a margin, however the Prime hasn't changed .625, it
> has changed .500 or .750, depending on when you got it, but it has not
> changed .625, AND your margin hasn't changed at all.
>
> I am not in the position to argue the point that you have a personal loan
> or an Equity Line, but as a lender I can assure you that I have never
> extended a personal line in your circumstance, in all instances, I would
> extend a Home Equity Line of Credit.
>
> By extending an Equity Line, then I can put my name on title as a loss
> payee in the event you default on the loan. If I extend a Personal Line,
> then I am not sure I can get on title, and my interest is unsecured -
> meaning that I would have difficulty collecting on my interest if you
> defaulted. I might still lend money, but the rate wil be higher to protect
> my interests. Given the rate quote that you gave us, I can't help but
> think you have a HELOC and not a personal line.
>
>
>
>> The first invoice we received was for a payment of $228.33.
>> I don't know why that due amount was lower than expected. I will ask
>> them but feel it might have something to do with our closing date (not a
>> full 31 day billing cycle).
>>
>
> Well, your 1st trust deed has its payment due on the 1st of the month,
> your 2nd trust deed can be due on any day of the month. When your loan
> closed, the 1st had an interest charge that brough the interest due up to
> the 30th of the current month, and you interest began accruing on the 1st
> of the following month, and was due for you to make a payment on the 1st
> of the subsequent month, and on the 1st of each month thereafter. The 2nd
> can be due to be paid on any day, the 5th or the 15th for example. Since
> your first payment due might not have been a full month, it would be short
> relative to the other months.
>
>
>
>
>
>> In any rate, a few days before due date we paid the amount due ($228.33)
>> PLUS an additional $1000, fully expecting that THAT $1000 would be
>> subtracted from the principal.
>>
>> We were really shocked to see our latest statement.
>>
>
> OK, now we are getting to concrete facts.
>
> You paid 228 PLUS 1000? If so, then the 228 should have serviced the
> interest due and the extra grand should have goe to reduce the outstanding
> principle. If you started with a principle balance of 70,000, then yo
> should have gone to a new balance of 69,000.
>
> Bear with me as I digest this ...
>
>
>
>
>> Here are the numbers.
>> APR went to 6.25% (I have to set up automatic transfer to get a 1/4 pt
>> reduction on the APR.....ok fine
>>
>> Total Previous Balance - $68,728.33 (They added the finance charge to
>> the previously due principal)
>>
>> Payments - $1228.83
>>
>> Finance Charge $355.54
>>
>> Total New Balance - $67,855.54
>>
>> APR - 6.25%
>>
>>
>
> OK, the new Finance Charge is the new interest.
>
> Logic - which does not always apply in banking - says that they should
> have taken the orignial Amount Due and subtracted $1000, then applied the
> Finance Charge to the remaining amount, especially if you paid the Amount
> Due before the Due Date. So, you receive a bill that has a Due Date of
> March 30 <or whatever>. You make the payment, and ADD $1000. The next
> billing should be for the principle minus $1000, times the interest per
> day for the number of days in the billing period. The payments you send in
> should service the interest due first, then subtract any over payment from
> the principle. The next payment should look at the balance of the previous
> period, and multiply by the interest due per day by the number of days.
>
> What the bank says is that you had a payment due, you made it but in the
> mean time the Interest Clock continued to click. The next biling should be
> for the number of days at the old balance, plus the number of days at the
> new balance.
>
> I think I understand your question, why did they deduct what appears to be
> "unearned interest" from the overpayment that you wanted to apply to the
> principle? This is a good question. If you continue tooverpay $1000 extra
> for each month, then this loan (the 2nd Trust Deed) should be retired in
> 70 months. If you made a fixed payment each month, say $1350, then the
> logic says your pricniple repayment should accelerate because the payments
> remain the same but the interest due should be going down.
>
>
>> We expected the additional $1000 (it was provided as a second payment
>> labled 'for principal only') to be substracted from the principal. In a
>> sense it was.
>>
>> $68.728.33
>> - $1228.33
>> -----------
>> $67,500.00
>>
>> But then they calculated the 6.25 APR monthly interest.
>>
>> 67,500 x .0625 = $4218.75/12 = $351.56
>>
>
> The math here works out correctly, the equation you gave does indeed work
> out to a solution of $351.62. They will add the new Finance Charge to the
> Previous Balance, then subtract the payment.
>
> Next month, the Fincance Charge will be recalculated on the same formula
> ...
>
>
>> and added the finance charge (in my case) $ 355.54 to the principal and
>> my 'new balance' is now $67,855.54
>>
>>
>> That's why I keep calling it revolving credit. Its just like a credit
>> card and frankly, we didn't expect that.
>>
>
> One thing that I have not calculated, and it appears you might not
> understand, is that interest due is calculated and collected in arrears.
>
> The deffinition of arrears is subtle but significant.
>
> When you make a car loan payment, for example, on the 1st of the month,
> you are paying for the NEXT MONTH's use of the money (interest). When you
> make a Mortgage Loan payment your paymen tof for the PRIOR MONTH's use of
> the money.
>
> If your loan balance is 70,000, then the payment at 6.25% is (interest
> only) is $364.58. If you overpay, the balance will drop, but the next
> payment will look back to the previous month and calculate the interest
> due for the next 30 days, and you get a bill.
>
> However, from your description, it looks like they took the current
> interest and applied the payment, then took the next interest and took it
> from the $1000, then calculated new interest on monies they already
> collected.
>
> One of us is not understanding what has happened, because it is clearly
> illegal if it happened the way I just outlined.
>
>
>
>
>> Obviously the only way you keep from taking a bath with this type of
>> loan is pay it off. But we are not in a position to do that.
>>
>
> Most people aren't. Don't stress about this.
>
>
>
>
>
>> We can afford the payments, have excellent credit and no debt at all
>> aside from the house.
>>
>> In your opinion do you think we might have any options with this re
>> refinancing just this 20% part or pay it off with another more
>> conventional loan?
>>
>
> You can certainly refinance the loan(s) into a single 1st Trust Deed. All
> that is needed is that you attain 12 months of seasoning, the loan has to
> be 12 months old to use a new appraised value, but that new value has to
> be enough to let you take a new loan and remain below 80% Loan to Value.
>
> Using round numbers, you have a 2nd Trust Deed of $70,000. This gives a
> Sales Price of $350,000 if 20% LTV. To refi your current 1st and 2nd into
> a new loan, you need an appraised value of about $438,000 or better.
> (350,000 / .080 = 437,500) This will give you a new 1st that will pay the
> 2nd off. If I could get an appraised value on your house of $450,000, I
> could give you a new loan of $360,000 and pay all of your closing costs.
> This means that you would have no out of pocket costs, except the
> Appraiser's Fee.
>
> Send me your full name and address off line, and I can check public
> records and tell you of there is a snowball's chance in Hell of getting a
> $450,000 value.
>
> Jeff Strickland
> Jeff@citymortgage.net
> jstrickland@ez2.net
>
> City Mortgage Services
> SanDiego, CA.
>
>
>
>
>> Or is that difficult with this type of 'second mortgage'.
>>
>> Any other options?
>>
>> Once again, many thanks in advance for your insight.
>>
>> Gerry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>I have a few questions on what options I might have if any.
>>>>
>>>> I recently purchased a new build and took an 80/20 interest only 3
>>>> year ARM. Having previously always bought via VA, I did not fully
>>>> consider the ramifications of the 20 portion being a 'personal line
>>>> of credit' in terms of the 'revolving credit' aspect of the deal.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The 20 is not, or it isn't in my state, a personal line of credit or
>>> revovling credit. It is a full on mortgage secured by a lien on the
>>> property. The reason you take this kind of loan is that you do not
>>> want to take PMI (private mortgage insurance) with your 100% loan. The
>>> PMI is a feature of the VA loan, but these days the VA loans are not
>>> very competitive and they aren't large enough for many new home
>>> purchase transactions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I made an addtional payment of $1000 on the 20% portion of the loan
>>>> on the first payment and it was a real eye opener to see that the
>>>> 'principal' was not reduced by $1000 as it had the finance charge
>>>> added like a credit card.The 20% portion is also subject to prime
>>>> rate fluctuations.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, of course. If you pay $1000, the first thing the lender will
>>> take is the interest that is due, the remainder will go towards the
>>> principle. This is true of any mortgage loan, with the exception of
>>> the impounds that will be taken if there are any impounds - impounds
>>> will be set aside before the principle is reduced.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I had previously talked to the bank about making addtional payments
>>>> on principal only and got a story about how I had a 3-5 day period
>>>> around the posting date when I could do that. I will see them again
>>>> for a clarification but I got the impression that if I made
>>>> additional payments outside that window, I would not get 'full
>>>> credit' for those payments.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You didn't tell us what the loan amount was or the rate, but if we
>>> made some simple asumptions, yo could tailor the numbers to fit your
>>> particular scenario.
>>>
>>> Let's assume the 2nd is for 50,000. I haven't got my loan caluclator
>>> handy, but let's also assume the interest rate is 7.5%, the interest
>>> due on the note would be 312.50 (50,000 x .0750 = 3750 / 12 = 312.50).
>>> This means that the first 312.50 of your payment will go to service
>>> the interest, the remainder will service the principle. Many 2nd's are
>>> a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) that lets you make interest only
>>> payments for the first 10 years. If you had a statement with a Payment
>>> Due of 312.50, then this is the interest that the bank demands you pay
>>> them. Any additional monies you pay at the time of payment will go to
>>> service the principle. The subesquent payments will be recalculated on
>>> the remaining principle.
>>>
>>> If you made additional payments outside of the window, those payments
>>> would not go to the principle in their entirety, the bank would
>>> service some of the interest that has become due shine the last
>>> payment. Your best strategy is to make additional payments at the time
>>> of your payment that is currently due.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Current balance on the 20 is 67885 on a 6.25 APR.There are 31 days in
>>>> the billing cycle.
>>>>
>>>> My questions are:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is there any payment frequency/amount option(s) which would
>>>> minimize the
>>>> finance charge?
>>>>
>>>> 2) Any other options that would reduce or eliminate the revolving
>>>> credit aspect of this, i.e re-financing the 20% portion only or
>>>> whatever?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure what the "revolving credit" aspect is that you keep
>>> talking about. If you have a HELOC, then perhaps that is the revolving
>>> quality that you are talking about. If you have a HELOC, then it mose
>>> certainly does have a revolving quality. That is, as you repay the
>>> principle, that principle can be used again during the first 10 years
>>> of the loan.
>>>
>>> If you took out a $70,000 note for 6.25%, then you could calculate
>>> your payment by multiplying the principle by the rate, and dividing
>>> the result by 12. This may vary a small amount due to the term of any
>>> particular billing period, but you should be pretty close. Using this
>>> formula, your payment should be roughly $365.00. If you made a payment
>>> of $1000, then your principle should be reduced next month by $635, so
>>> your next payment should be based on $67,885 - $635 = $67,250. The
>>> next payment should be $350, so the same $1000 you send in should
>>> reduce the outstanding principle by $650, and so on.
>>>
>>> Since in this scenario, you will have reduced the principle by $1285
>>> over two payment cycles, then you will have an available balance of
>>> this amount, plus any previous principle reductions. This means that
>>> you can used mortgage dollars to do landscaping work or buy the big
>>> screen, and transfer the interest from your credit card to your
>>> mortgage. The reason you might want to do this is that mortgage
>>> interest is tax deducatble, credit card interest is not. And, mortgage
>>> interest is lower so you save on several fronts. You have the repaid
>>> principle available to you for furture spending for a period of 10
>>> years, after 10 years has gone by, you have 15 years to repay any
>>> outstanding balance.
>>>
>>> Another benefit of what you did is you avoid the PMI. PMI premiums are
>>> not tax deductable but mortgage interest is. If you took out a 100%
>>> loan and carried PMI, the payment would be higher than the payment on
>>> the 80/20, and the interest you pay on the 20% is tax deducatble
>>> whereas the payment to the PMI has no tax advantage.
>>>
>>> So, the short answer to your question is, pay more than the bank asks
>>> for, and include the overpayment in the payment that is due. This will
>>> reduce your outstanding balance by the difference in what is due and
>>> what you paid them. The subsequent payments will be recalculated on
>>> the lower principal balance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>




Similar ThreadsPosted
40 and 50 year mortgages? A few questions if anyone can answer.... June 6, 2007, 9:24 pm
looking to refinance existing equity line for 30 year fixed July 7, 2005, 10:23 am
Question April 1, 2006, 11:03 am
Refinancing Question June 30, 2005, 7:37 pm
question on refinance after 3.5 yrs August 24, 2005, 6:44 pm
Mortgage question February 12, 2006, 9:16 am
Client with a question? February 19, 2006, 1:03 am
Newbie Question May 9, 2006, 8:41 pm
Mortgage Question from Steve February 12, 2006, 3:44 pm
FHA mortgage qualification question June 13, 2008, 9:58 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap