|
Posted by BradGuth on May 14, 2008, 9:49 am
Please log in for more thread options > Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
>
> Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional Borg
> into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the scientific
> process.
>
> I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am pleased
> that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
> I do not discourage it.
> Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are encouraged.
> Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to philosophers.
> Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
>
> If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory. About
> half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is not
> ready to accept it.
>
> ...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
> It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good recognition of
> fantasy)
>
> By all means, continue!
>
>
>
> >> I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
>
> >> The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
> >> Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting to
> >> discuss them.
>
> >> Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
> >> science
> >> reporting through regular avenues.
>
>
>
> >> >> The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
> >> >> gravity
> >> >> is a cruel joke.
> >> >> Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
>
> >> >> For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites
> >> >> with
> >> >> someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
> >> >> Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
> >> >> Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> > Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth
> >> >> >> > does?
>
> >> >> > Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
> >> >> > Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core
> >> >> > could
> >> >> > be as much as 10%r hollow.
>
> >> >> > Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
> >> >> > . - Brad Guth
>
> >> > According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
> >> > or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
>
> >> > Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
> >> > zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
> >> > whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
> >> > started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
> >> > artificially or otherwise compressed.
>
> >> > This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
> >> > just that it's technically possible.
> >> > . - Brad Guth
>
> > But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
> > remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
> > as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
> > as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
> > banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
> > exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
>
> > Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
> > with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
> > intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
> > course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
> > mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
> > . - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth
| 
XML Sitemap