|
Posted by Steven L Umbach on July 6, 2006, 8:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options Yes you are right. I was referring to Windows Rights Management Services.
Thanks for correcting me. I know it is not something that is trivial to
implement. --- Steve
> Steve,
>
> Are you referring to Windows Rights Management Services? The
> infrastructure requirements are pretty large (SQL server, IIS, Active
> Directory), but you aren't required to have a PKI implementation.
>
> microsoft.public.rights_mgmt_svcs newsgroup.
>
> You're right though -- it won't prevent a digital camera in front of the
> screen. :)
>
> --
> Brian Lich
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
>
>
>> If those users need access to those file there is not much you can do
>> other than look at using Microsoft Digital Rights Management which is not
>> something that is simple to set up and needs a SQL server, PKI, and
>> compatible applications. If you have malicious users that want to steal
>> data they most likely would have already done that long before they gave
>> their notice of leaving or they may simply stay employed for the sole
>> reason of stealing your data. Even DRM can not prevent determined users
>> who could simply write down information by hand or take digital photos of
>> the display monitor. -- Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to find a solution for the following scenario.
>>>
>>> I have my data stored on a Windows 2003 strd server. I am concerned that
>>> users who are about to leave the company can just copy sensitive data to
>>> any device and will be able to use it at a competitor.
>>> I would still like to use offline files on notebooks to access the
>>> files. I dont want to disable the use of removable media.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use a certificate to encrypt the files based on the
>>> location they are stored, i.e.: opened from the server = ok , Opened
>>> from a Cdrom = bad?
>>>
>>> I am not too worried about being able to use offline files, but it would
>>> be nice.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the pointers and suggestions.
>>> Graham
>>>
>>> _________________
>>> remove _SPAM-=_=-NO_ to reply to me direct.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
| 
XML Sitemap