|
Posted by PGPS on November 8, 2006, 5:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > if I print "$1\n",
>> > the file prints just fine. But, if I do something like print "$1 after
>> > \n", the whole output is messed up. If I print "before $1\n", nothing
>> > prints at all. If I print "before $1 after\n", only after prints.
>>
>> not really sure, but could be a rogue "\r" in $1,
> There
> is a rogue carriage return (0xd) in the string
> Is there something I can do to deal with this
> situation?
Repair the corrupted file:
perl -p -i -e 'tr/\r//d' bad_file
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
Posted by Gunnar Hjalmarsson on November 8, 2006, 6:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > if I print "$1\n",
>> > the file prints just fine. But, if I do something like print "$1 after
>> > \n", the whole output is messed up. If I print "before $1\n", nothing
>> > prints at all. If I print "before $1 after\n", only after prints.
>>
>> not really sure, but could be a rogue "\r" in $1,
> There
> is a rogue carriage return (0xd) in the string
> Is there something I can do to deal with this
> situation?
Repair the corrupted file:
perl -p -i -e 'tr/\r//d' bad_file
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
Posted by Sisyphus on November 8, 2006, 8:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > if I print "$1\n",
>> > the file prints just fine. But, if I do something like print "$1 after
>> > \n", the whole output is messed up. If I print "before $1\n", nothing
>> > prints at all. If I print "before $1 after\n", only after prints.
>>
>> not really sure, but could be a rogue "\r" in $1,
> There
> is a rogue carriage return (0xd) in the string
> Is there something I can do to deal with this
> situation?
Repair the corrupted file:
perl -p -i -e 'tr/\r//d' bad_file
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
Posted by PGPS on November 9, 2006, 12:11 pm
Please log in for more thread options >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > if I print "$1\n",
>> > the file prints just fine. But, if I do something like print "$1 after
>> > \n", the whole output is messed up. If I print "before $1\n", nothing
>> > prints at all. If I print "before $1 after\n", only after prints.
>>
>> not really sure, but could be a rogue "\r" in $1,
> There
> is a rogue carriage return (0xd) in the string
> Is there something I can do to deal with this
> situation?
Repair the corrupted file:
perl -p -i -e 'tr/\r//d' bad_file
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
Posted by Sisyphus on November 9, 2006, 12:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > if I print "$1\n",
>> > the file prints just fine. But, if I do something like print "$1 after
>> > \n", the whole output is messed up. If I print "before $1\n", nothing
>> > prints at all. If I print "before $1 after\n", only after prints.
>>
>> not really sure, but could be a rogue "\r" in $1,
> There
> is a rogue carriage return (0xd) in the string
> Is there something I can do to deal with this
> situation?
Repair the corrupted file:
perl -p -i -e 'tr/\r//d' bad_file
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Home directory not seen as writable in Vista | August 3, 2007, 4:02 am |
| -d file test using Active State PERL under Windows | October 7, 2004, 10:58 am |
| perl with Active Directory | November 2, 2005, 4:14 am |
| PERL and Active DIrectory | June 28, 2007, 3:25 pm |
| Re: PERL and Active DIrectory | July 2, 2007, 9:47 pm |
| Active State perl for windows not working. | January 8, 2008, 3:34 pm |
| Problem with Win32-SerialPort over bluetooth @ windows + active perl | July 21, 2006, 4:08 am |
| Apache vs IIS current directory fro Perl script | May 8, 2008, 3:09 am |
| Apache and Perl in Windows | December 23, 2005, 7:29 pm |
| File::Find problem on windows+apache+activePerl | February 27, 2006, 10:54 am |
|