|
Posted by Phillip Windell on August 20, 2007, 11:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
> looking at the list of crosspost groups, it's reasonable, there is a
> decent expectation of an answer from each and the list is not overly
> extensive.
Ok, but if it is reasonable then it is borderline reasonable.
> Something's been missed in the discussion however. The 'throw the baby
> away' method of DC recovery is wasteful whether the DC be an SBS or not.
> Jean Paul needs to reassess/redesign his Disaster Recovery process. The
> original DC should have been 'recovered' rather than 'replaced'.
Agreed, most definately
I also like the comment made in another post that he needs to stop "doing
things" and work through the problem methodically.
> and all this gaff about 'there is no PDC/BDC in 2000+ AD's' just bores me,
> the FSMO role holders (though possibly distributed) are distinctly more
It doesn't bore me,...but having people use the PDB/BDC terms is like
"fingernails on a chalkboard" to me. I apparently hasn't been pointed out
enough if people are still using the terms. It's been over 7 years since
Windows 2000 came out,..it's time people figure it out. If poeple want to
distingush the PDC Role or the Global Catalog holder because it is relevant
to the context, that is fine.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
| 
XML Sitemap