|
Posted by Aaron Sanders on August 2, 2007, 9:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options I can understand that. I figured there had been consideration, and I was
curious. I wasn't sure if I was the only one in the world that even noticed
or cared. I tend to be a little more sensitive about those things because I
use my work Exchange server for business and personal appointements. So to
protect my privacy, I don't share my calendar, and I mark really personal
appointments as private. And people occasionally put too much information in
meeting requests.
"Scott Yost [MSFT]" wrote:
> People have vastly different ideas about what should show up over device
> lock. In this case it was far more common that people wanted their
> appointments to show over the lock screen.
> But this and similar arguments are always raging in here. To meet everyone's
> needs on this feature we would probably have to make it configurable.
>
> --
> Scott Yost
> Software Development Engineer/Test
> Microsoft Corp.
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> >I have my smartphone - Cingular 8125 running WM5 - set to require a
> >password
> > after an hour of inactivity. Works fine, except that if I receive a
> > notification for an appointment in Pocket Outlook, the notification dialog
> > appears over the password dialog box, and I can view the notification, and
> > snooze or dismiss it. Shouldn't you be required to log in before viewing
> > notifications or dismissing them? I have some apoointments that have
> > mildly
> > sensitive data in them.
>
>
>
| 
XML Sitemap