Click here to get back home

New record!

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 alt.internet.search-engines    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
New record! Trespasser 02-01-2008
---> Re: New record! Still Not The G...02-01-2008
|--> Re: New record! Andrew Heenan02-02-2008
Posted by Trespasser on February 1, 2008, 9:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options
4 days ago I hacked together 10 crappy new affiliate pages. 3 days ago
Google indexed them all and I got a bucket of hits from the page 3, most
popular keyword entries. Today Google have dumped the whole 10 pages. Fully
indexed and then completely dumped by Google in 3 days! That's gotta be some
sort of record.

I HATE Google.



Posted by Still Not The Goblin That's Go on February 1, 2008, 8:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>4 days ago I hacked together 10 crappy new affiliate pages. 3 days ago
>Google indexed them all and I got a bucket of hits from the page 3, most
>popular keyword entries. Today Google have dumped the whole 10 pages. Fully
>indexed and then completely dumped by Google in 3 days! That's gotta be some
>sort of record.
>
>I HATE Google.
>
Was it all white hat ?
Was it unique content ?

Was the site completely inside googles guidelines ?
--
"Religion is based upon blind faith supported by no evidence. Science is based
upon confidence that results from evidence -
and that confidence can be modified and/or reversed by further observations and
experimentation.
Science approaches truth, closer and closer, by hard dedicated work. Religion
already has it all decided, and it's "in the book.
It's dogma, unchangeable, and unaffected by reality and whatever facts we come
upon in the real world." -- James Randi

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Posted by Trespasser on February 1, 2008, 9:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: New record!


> Was it all white hat ?
> Was it unique content ?
>
> Was the site completely inside googles guidelines ?


Not really sure on any of these points. This truly is terrible affiliate
crap (that worked well for a while), but see for yourself:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/Hooch/White_Widow_Marijuana_Seed_And_Supplier_Review.php
Apart from the obvious moral issues there may be other reasons for it's
failure that I don't understand.



Posted by teranews on February 2, 2008, 12:18 am
Please log in for more thread options

> ----- Original Message -----
> Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:09 AM
> Subject: Re: New record!
>
>
>> Was it all white hat ?
>> Was it unique content ?
>>
>> Was the site completely inside googles guidelines ?
>
>
> Not really sure on any of these points. This truly is terrible affiliate
> crap (that worked well for a while), but see for yourself:
>
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/Hooch/White_Widow_Marijuana_Seed_And_Supplier_Review.php
> Apart from the obvious moral issues there may be other reasons for it's
> failure that I don't understand.
>

It might be interesting to put Google Adsense on there. If it comes back
with on topic links, obviously the moral question doesn't concern Google.

Google allegedly hates affiliate links, so I might suggest adding "nofollow"
to all your affiliate links.

--
Rich
http://www.richdavies.com/tomtom.htm




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Posted by Trespasser on February 3, 2008, 5:19 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hi Rich,

Thanks for the input regarding the Adsense moral issue test, and about the
rel="nofollow" tag.

The nofollow tag is an interesting one. I've always used the nofollow tag on
affiliate links as I can't see the point of either bleeding out PR, or of
promoting what effectively becomes an affiliate competitor site. One site I
had was working great like this, and then wham! Nothing but image search
engine traffic. Google seemed to have tagged it as affiliate rubbish
(guilty), and put it way down in the search returns queue.

I wonder if their isn't some sneaky means of preventing Google from ever
knowing they are dealing with an affiliate site, with or without nofollow
attributes? Maybe if outbound links were made to point to local files whose
sole purpose is to redirect to the affiliate site. We then block these local
redirection pages from Google's evil gaze with a robots.txt entry. Heavens,
that sounds like a lot of work. I guess if Google are onto the nofollow
trick (and I really don't know if they are or not) then they're probably
onto every other conceivable measure.

One thing's for sure. Google hates affiliate sites, and consequently I still
hate Google.

Tressie.

>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
>> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: New record!
>>
>>
>>> Was it all white hat ?
>>> Was it unique content ?
>>>
>>> Was the site completely inside googles guidelines ?
>>
>>
>> Not really sure on any of these points. This truly is terrible affiliate
>> crap (that worked well for a while), but see for yourself:
>>
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/Hooch/White_Widow_Marijuana_Seed_And_Supplier_Review.php
>> Apart from the obvious moral issues there may be other reasons for it's
>> failure that I don't understand.
>>
>
> It might be interesting to put Google Adsense on there. If it comes back
> with on topic links, obviously the moral question doesn't concern Google.
>
> Google allegedly hates affiliate links, so I might suggest adding
> "nofollow" to all your affiliate links.
>
> --
> Rich
> http://www.richdavies.com/tomtom.htm
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
The old 301 302 "A" record dance... September 27, 2005, 9:45 pm
IBL update - new record set October 17, 2005, 9:15 pm
The Search Works makes record losses August 6, 2006, 10:49 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap