Click here to get back home

NTFS permission problem

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 microsoft.public.windows.server.security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
NTFS permission problem tornado579 03-31-2006
Posted by tornado579 on March 31, 2006, 11:36 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hi group,

Hope you can help me with this one. I dont know what am i doing wrong.

OS is windows 2003 in AD environment. This configuration is done on the
server side:

I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
Documents folder is
shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group since i am
going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions. So for test
folder i have assigned the permissions
only for that particular group and adminstrator.

When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
tab for any folder
under test folder i am able to change permissions from client side
directly. I have tried
all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I dont know
what is going wrong here.

Any sort of inputs will be of great help. Thanks in advance.

Thanks,

Tornado.


Posted by Bill on March 31, 2006, 12:05 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I'll ask the dumb question - are you logging in as yourself, or as the
"restricted" user?

If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at the share level, and do not grant
full control to non-administrators at the NTFS level, users should not be
able to change permissions.

> Hi group,
>
> Hope you can help me with this one. I dont know what am i doing wrong.
>
> OS is windows 2003 in AD environment. This configuration is done on the
> server side:
>
> I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
> Documents folder is
> shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group since i am
> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions. So for test
> folder i have assigned the permissions
> only for that particular group and adminstrator.
>
> When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
> tab for any folder
> under test folder i am able to change permissions from client side
> directly. I have tried
> all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I dont know
> what is going wrong here.
>
> Any sort of inputs will be of great help. Thanks in advance.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tornado.
>



Posted by AllenM on March 31, 2006, 1:11 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Let me try to break this down to help better understand so that I may
provide some helpful input here.

1. "I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
Documents folder is shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group
since i am
going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions."

THIS IS CORRECT. WHENEVER YOU WANT TO SHARE A FOLDER IT IS GOOD PRACTICE TO
ASSIGN "EVERYONE" FULL ACCES AT THE SHARE LEVEL AND RESTRICT FOLDER ACCESS
USING NTFS FOLDER/FILE PERMISSIONS.

2. So for test folder i have assigned the permissions only for that
particular group and adminstrator.

WHAT ARE THE PERMISSIONS YOU ASSIGNED TO THE ADMINISTRATORS AND THIS
PARTICULAR GROUP?

3. When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
tab for any folder under test folder i am able to change permissions from
client side directly.

WHO ARE YOU LOGGING IN AS?

4. I have tried all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I
dont know what is going wrong here.

WHAT ARE THESE COMBINATIONS? i TAKE IT YOU ARE TRYING TO "NOT" ALLOW THIS
PARTICULAR GROUP THE RIGHT TO CHANGE PERMISSIONS? IS THIS A CORRECT
STATEMENT?

5. Bill's statement is incorrect. "If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at
the share level, and do not grant full control to non-administrators at the
NTFS level, users should not be able to change permissions."

YOU CAN ASSIGN ANY GROUP OR USER THE RIGHT TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS" WITHOUT
GIVING THEM FULL CONTROL OR MAKING THEM A MEMBER OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP.
YOU CAN ASSIGN THEM "SPECIAL PERMISSIONS". IN OTHER WORDS, FOR EXAMPLE, I
CAN ASSIGN A GROUP OR USER READ/WRITE ONLY AND GIVE THEM "SPECIAL
PERMISSIONS" TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS". THIS CAN BE DONE FROM THE "ADVANCE"
FEATURES.





"Bill" <it_professional_0812 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> I'll ask the dumb question - are you logging in as yourself, or as the
> "restricted" user?
>
> If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at the share level, and do not grant
> full control to non-administrators at the NTFS level, users should not be
> able to change permissions.
>
>> Hi group,
>>
>> Hope you can help me with this one. I dont know what am i doing wrong.
>>
>> OS is windows 2003 in AD environment. This configuration is done on the
>> server side:
>>
>> I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
>> Documents folder is
>> shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group since i am
>> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions. So for test
>> folder i have assigned the permissions
>> only for that particular group and adminstrator.
>>
>> When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
>> tab for any folder
>> under test folder i am able to change permissions from client side
>> directly. I have tried
>> all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I dont know
>> what is going wrong here.
>>
>> Any sort of inputs will be of great help. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tornado.
>>
>
>



Posted by Bill on March 31, 2006, 1:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options
There is nothing incorrect about this statement: "If you set "Everyone -
Full Control" at
the share level, and do not grant full control to non-administrators at the
NTFS level, users should not be able to change permissions."

While it is true that you can assign special permissions to allow
non-administrators to change permissions, if the group is not granted full
control on the standard tab, they cannot change NTFS permissions, period.

> Let me try to break this down to help better understand so that I may
> provide some helpful input here.
>
> 1. "I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
> Documents folder is shared. I have given full permissions for everyone
> group since i am
> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions."
>
> THIS IS CORRECT. WHENEVER YOU WANT TO SHARE A FOLDER IT IS GOOD PRACTICE
> TO ASSIGN "EVERYONE" FULL ACCES AT THE SHARE LEVEL AND RESTRICT FOLDER
> ACCESS USING NTFS FOLDER/FILE PERMISSIONS.
>
> 2. So for test folder i have assigned the permissions only for that
> particular group and adminstrator.
>
> WHAT ARE THE PERMISSIONS YOU ASSIGNED TO THE ADMINISTRATORS AND THIS
> PARTICULAR GROUP?
>
> 3. When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
> tab for any folder under test folder i am able to change permissions from
> client side directly.
>
> WHO ARE YOU LOGGING IN AS?
>
> 4. I have tried all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked.
> I dont know what is going wrong here.
>
> WHAT ARE THESE COMBINATIONS? i TAKE IT YOU ARE TRYING TO "NOT" ALLOW THIS
> PARTICULAR GROUP THE RIGHT TO CHANGE PERMISSIONS? IS THIS A CORRECT
> STATEMENT?
>
> 5. Bill's statement is incorrect. "If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at
> the share level, and do not grant full control to non-administrators at
> the NTFS level, users should not be able to change permissions."
>
> YOU CAN ASSIGN ANY GROUP OR USER THE RIGHT TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS" WITHOUT
> GIVING THEM FULL CONTROL OR MAKING THEM A MEMBER OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE
> GROUP. YOU CAN ASSIGN THEM "SPECIAL PERMISSIONS". IN OTHER WORDS, FOR
> EXAMPLE, I CAN ASSIGN A GROUP OR USER READ/WRITE ONLY AND GIVE THEM
> "SPECIAL PERMISSIONS" TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS". THIS CAN BE DONE FROM THE
> "ADVANCE" FEATURES.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Bill" <it_professional_0812 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> I'll ask the dumb question - are you logging in as yourself, or as the
>> "restricted" user?
>>
>> If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at the share level, and do not grant
>> full control to non-administrators at the NTFS level, users should not be
>> able to change permissions.
>>
>>> Hi group,
>>>
>>> Hope you can help me with this one. I dont know what am i doing wrong.
>>>
>>> OS is windows 2003 in AD environment. This configuration is done on the
>>> server side:
>>>
>>> I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
>>> Documents folder is
>>> shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group since i am
>>> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions. So for test
>>> folder i have assigned the permissions
>>> only for that particular group and adminstrator.
>>>
>>> When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
>>> tab for any folder
>>> under test folder i am able to change permissions from client side
>>> directly. I have tried
>>> all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I dont know
>>> what is going wrong here.
>>>
>>> Any sort of inputs will be of great help. Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tornado.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Posted by AllenM on March 31, 2006, 1:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options
That is not true. Reread your statement. "and do not grant full control to
non-administrators at the NTFS level, users should not be able to change
permissions"
This is not true because I would be able to change permissions without
granting FULL control by doing what I said. Perhaps you forgot to include
the "unless" at the end of your statement. Do a google search on NTFS
Folder/File permissions. They have some great articles you can use to learn
more about NTFS permissions.

Now reread what I said.

"YOU CAN ASSIGN ANY GROUP OR USER THE RIGHT TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS" WITHOUT
GIVING THEM FULL CONTROL OR MAKING THEM A MEMBER OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP.

But I'm not going to argue it any furthur as this does not help the poster
resolve his issues.



"Bill" <it_professional_0812 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> There is nothing incorrect about this statement: "If you set "Everyone -
> Full Control" at
> the share level, and do not grant full control to non-administrators at
> the
> NTFS level, users should not be able to change permissions."
>
> While it is true that you can assign special permissions to allow
> non-administrators to change permissions, if the group is not granted full
> control on the standard tab, they cannot change NTFS permissions, period.
>
>> Let me try to break this down to help better understand so that I may
>> provide some helpful input here.
>>
>> 1. "I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
>> Documents folder is shared. I have given full permissions for everyone
>> group since i am
>> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions."
>>
>> THIS IS CORRECT. WHENEVER YOU WANT TO SHARE A FOLDER IT IS GOOD PRACTICE
>> TO ASSIGN "EVERYONE" FULL ACCES AT THE SHARE LEVEL AND RESTRICT FOLDER
>> ACCESS USING NTFS FOLDER/FILE PERMISSIONS.
>>
>> 2. So for test folder i have assigned the permissions only for that
>> particular group and adminstrator.
>>
>> WHAT ARE THE PERMISSIONS YOU ASSIGNED TO THE ADMINISTRATORS AND THIS
>> PARTICULAR GROUP?
>>
>> 3. When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
>> tab for any folder under test folder i am able to change permissions from
>> client side directly.
>>
>> WHO ARE YOU LOGGING IN AS?
>>
>> 4. I have tried all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked.
>> I dont know what is going wrong here.
>>
>> WHAT ARE THESE COMBINATIONS? i TAKE IT YOU ARE TRYING TO "NOT" ALLOW THIS
>> PARTICULAR GROUP THE RIGHT TO CHANGE PERMISSIONS? IS THIS A CORRECT
>> STATEMENT?
>>
>> 5. Bill's statement is incorrect. "If you set "Everyone - Full Control"
>> at the share level, and do not grant full control to non-administrators
>> at the NTFS level, users should not be able to change permissions."
>>
>> YOU CAN ASSIGN ANY GROUP OR USER THE RIGHT TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS"
>> WITHOUT GIVING THEM FULL CONTROL OR MAKING THEM A MEMBER OF AN
>> ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP. YOU CAN ASSIGN THEM "SPECIAL PERMISSIONS". IN OTHER
>> WORDS, FOR EXAMPLE, I CAN ASSIGN A GROUP OR USER READ/WRITE ONLY AND GIVE
>> THEM "SPECIAL PERMISSIONS" TO "CHANGE PERMISSIONS". THIS CAN BE DONE FROM
>> THE "ADVANCE" FEATURES.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Bill" <it_professional_0812 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> I'll ask the dumb question - are you logging in as yourself, or as the
>>> "restricted" user?
>>>
>>> If you set "Everyone - Full Control" at the share level, and do not
>>> grant full control to non-administrators at the NTFS level, users should
>>> not be able to change permissions.
>>>
>>>> Hi group,
>>>>
>>>> Hope you can help me with this one. I dont know what am i doing wrong.
>>>>
>>>> OS is windows 2003 in AD environment. This configuration is done on the
>>>> server side:
>>>>
>>>> I have a folder called test under another folder called as Documents.
>>>> Documents folder is
>>>> shared. I have given full permissions for everyone group since i am
>>>> going to control the folder accesses via NTFS permissions. So for test
>>>> folder i have assigned the permissions
>>>> only for that particular group and adminstrator.
>>>>
>>>> When i login from client machine and check the permissons via security
>>>> tab for any folder
>>>> under test folder i am able to change permissions from client side
>>>> directly. I have tried
>>>> all sorts of combinations but to my surprise none worked. I dont know
>>>> what is going wrong here.
>>>>
>>>> Any sort of inputs will be of great help. Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Tornado.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
NTFS permission problem November 30, 2006, 3:57 pm
NTFS Permission April 21, 2006, 10:04 am
Share Permission vs NTFS July 18, 2006, 2:02 pm
ntfs special permission question September 1, 2006, 1:50 pm
Share folder and NTFS permission April 10, 2008, 6:47 pm
NTFS Rname VS. Delete Permission April 23, 2008, 1:36 am
Spontaneous permission changes-How?Why? September 23, 2005, 2:06 pm
Permission Issue September 28, 2005, 10:55 am
Adobe permission January 4, 2006, 2:03 pm
File Permission June 14, 2008, 5:36 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap