|
Posted by enmicabesa on October 7, 2005, 8:04 am
Please log in for more thread options
Brad Guth wrote:
> Our moon by day is in fact "hotter than holy hell".
> I'd been referring to various substances as per those having been
> situated or sequestered within a sufficient vacuum. However, if that
> vacuum so happens to include a crystal clear surround as that of an
> insulative layer of radon gas isn't going to exactly make such items
> any cooler, that plus of what has been said about the extremely hot and
> nasty particles that coexist throughout the Van Allen zone/expanse are
> of what's further suggesting that it can get and sustain such small
> particles(various atoms and most certainly a good dusting worth of
> iron) as per being extremely hot while you're situated within such a
> near vacuum as a fully solar/cosmic exposure mode of being essentially
> naked, and especially humanly hot and nasty while having to trek
> yourself across a less than 5 g/cm2 worth of an extremely dark
> moon-dust surface-tension, that's of all things being its hot and nasty
> self is also a bit photon reactive to boot (especially as derived off
> the items of higher density, like starting off with basalt at 3.1
> g/cm3) which supposedly accomplishes a terrific job of generating them
> hard-X-rays.
>
> Perhaps the lunar atmospheric element of the sodium element in of
> itself is even a wee bit hotter than we'd previously understood, and
> certainly of a greater population/m3 than we'd previously thought, and
> perhaps especially of those sodium atoms as having ranged more than
> 900,000 km away from the lunar deck by such solar winds had to have
> been individually "hotter than holy hell".
> WOW! Is that close to being wicked hot?
> Since we still have absolutely nothing that's interactively sharing
> scientific squat from the surface of our moon, perhaps certain folks
> can best inform us village idiots as to what the temperature actually
> is of the solar winds (100 ~ 2400 km/s), thus putting into perspective
> as to what a supposedly sparsely populated atmosphere of our moon might
> have to offer?
> 100^2400km/s? try moron not idiot
> Seems we're being told to assume that such hot and nasty particles as
> being closely associated with the nearly naked surface of the moon will
> not in any measurable way degrade nor much less penetrate a given
> moonsuit that's being wide-field (360 x 180) exposed to whatever's
> physical that's coming along at good velocity, plus wide-spectrum
> radiated upon from every which way but lose, and that's having to
> include from the bottom up. Thus it's not just speaking about thermal
> conduction and radiated thermal energy as it's involving what DNA/RNA
> hot and nasty about being anywhere near the solar illuminated portions
> of or moon.
> DNA/RNA what about my ING investment?
> I'm no expert wizard of Oz but, butt what? seems like the environment of our
moon
> (especially by day) offers a perfectly good reason for using robust
> robots, and/or the sorts of LUNAR-A impact probes that are DNA/RNA
> deficient to start off with.
> ~
>
> Life on Venus includes your basic Township, Bridge & Tarmac:
> http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
> Russian/Chinese LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
> http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
> A few other sub-topics of interest by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
> http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
| 
XML Sitemap