Click here to get back home

How to define a HTML page not allow scroll bars and resize?

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
How to define a HTML page not allow scroll bars and resize? RC 07-26-2006
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by Joel Shepherd on July 28, 2006, 1:03 am
Please log in for more thread options



> PTM wrote:
>
> >
> > And here was me thinking that in a newsgroup you asked a question in order
> > to find out some information, not to get an agitated response as to why you
> > shouldn't do what you want to.
>
> I suppose if you were a teacher and a kid in your classroom asked how he
> could make an indelible ink he could use to write on his desk, you would
> tell him how to make it instead of telling him not to do it?

The indelible ink part is interesting, because it gets into solvents and
binders and such. There is an opportunity there to actually teach the
kid about something interesting and useful, instead of growling "No!"
and telling him/her to go away.

Using the indelible ink to semi-permanently deface the desk is also
interesting, because it's an opportunity to teach something about
ownership, respect and responsibility.

So, yes: I would (if I could) tell the kid how to make it, and also
advise him that defacing property that is not his is not likely to work
out in his favor.

He/She is curious. It is not inappropriate to encourage and satisfy that
curiosity, while at the same time imparting a lesson about
responsibility. Never assume malice when ignorance (or innocence) will
do.

It's really not that hard.

--
Joel.

Posted by Dan on July 26, 2006, 11:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options


PTM wrote:
> That's not always true. Often users get frustrated or annoyed by windows
> that are far too big or small for the content. Sometimes it's preferable
> (user wise) for the window size to be dictated by the developer.

What about windows that are forced by the developer to be too small for
the content, and in which resizing and scrollbars have been disabled,
so that there's no way to see all of the content? I've run into that
sort of atrocity all too often. Developers who perpretrate these
crimes against humanity should be executed by firing squad.

--
Dan


Posted by PTM on July 27, 2006, 12:09 am
Please log in for more thread options


> PTM wrote:
>> That's not always true. Often users get frustrated or annoyed by windows
>> that are far too big or small for the content. Sometimes it's preferable
>> (user wise) for the window size to be dictated by the developer.
>
> What about windows that are forced by the developer to be too small for
> the content, and in which resizing and scrollbars have been disabled,
> so that there's no way to see all of the content? I've run into that
> sort of atrocity all too often. Developers who perpretrate these
> crimes against humanity should be executed by firing squad.
>
> --
> Dan
>
That's exactly what I just said.

>> users get frustrated or annoyed by windows
>> that are far too big or small for the content. Sometimes it's preferable
>> (user wise) for the window size to be dictated by the developer

I've seen users who ARE allowed to do anything they want with
windows/dialogs/etc, minimize errors boxes that MUST have an option selected
before they continue. And also those who reduce the size so small they can't
see the actual window because of so much other clutter the have open. Then
they wonder why things aren't working.

Please note I did say "sometimes it's preferable", users CAN be stupid,
nothing can be idiot proof, but reducing the problems they can potentially
cause themselves, through good interface design, is often preferable to
personal (user) preference.

The original question was about html/css NOT the rights or wrongs of
interface design. Perhaps the guy who asked it is one of those who likes to
do it right and put the right content into the right place at the right time
to get the right results. Perhaps we should also consider starting an
Interface Design newsgroup so everyone who has had to put up with shoddy
developers can bitch about it to their hearts content :-)

Phil



Posted by Jack on July 27, 2006, 2:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options


PTM wrote:
>
> I've seen users who ARE allowed to do anything they want with
> windows/dialogs/etc, minimize errors boxes that MUST have an option
> selected before they continue.

Wrong use of eror boxes; they shouild only be used for information. You
have described a dialog.

> And also those who reduce the size so small they can't see the actual
> window because of so much other clutter the have open. Then they
> wonder why things aren't working.

You can't prevent users reformatting their hard disks either, luckily.
Sometimes people screw things up, and the only way you can prevent that
is by stopping them doing anything. However this isn't likely to be easy
on the worldwide web.
>
> Please note I did say "sometimes it's preferable", users CAN be
> stupid, nothing can be idiot proof, but reducing the problems they
> can potentially cause themselves, through good interface design, is
> often preferable to personal (user) preference.

However on the worldwide web, the users' preferences override the
authors'. That's just the way it is; it's just like that.

Perhaps you should be arguing that idiots should be prevented from using
the internet; I happen to believe that that position has a lot going for
it. Most others disagree. I also think that computers are still too
difficult for average folks to get to grips with. They should be given
games-consoles, or Web-TVs, instead. Real, programmable computers are
for geeks. Most others seem to disagree.

But it's moot; there's no way of preventing idiots from using the
internet. We all therefore have to account for idiots in the way we
design our services. Too bad for us. That's just the way it is. It's
just like that.
>
> The original question was about html/css NOT the rights or wrongs of
> interface design. Perhaps the guy who asked it is one of those who
> likes to do it right and put the right content into the right place
> at the right time to get the right results. Perhaps we should also
> consider starting an Interface Design newsgroup so everyone who has
> had to put up with shoddy developers can bitch about it to their
> hearts content :-)

I have no doubt that such newsgroups exist, somewhere among the 60,000
or so that my .newsrc is aware of. If they aren't particularly active,
that might be because there isn't a lot that's new to say about the
subject.

Or not.
--
Jack.
http://www.jackpot.uk.net/

Posted by Toby Inkster on July 27, 2006, 3:03 am
Please log in for more thread options


PTM wrote:

> That's not always true. Often users get frustrated or annoyed by windows
> that are far too big or small for the content. Sometimes it's preferable
> (user wise) for the window size to be dictated by the developer.

Suggested, perhaps; but dictated, no.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact


Similar ThreadsPosted
Frameset -> Page -> IFrame -> Frameset ...issue with scroll bars (Two issues) April 4, 2008, 6:45 pm
How to align elements and define resize behaviour? October 24, 2005, 4:02 pm
Get rid of scroll bars in IE strict August 17, 2008, 2:22 am
Only Vertical Scroll bar no horizontal bars August 26, 2005, 3:44 am
How to define links (css?) for just one part of a html page? October 19, 2005, 8:43 am
Material that does no scroll in web page January 10, 2008, 9:50 pm
CSS Table Resize January 24, 2007, 7:09 am
What makes a textArea resize itself December 23, 2004, 11:40 am
What makes a textArea resize itself January 2, 2005, 8:14 pm
Grammer teachers - a html page or an html page September 27, 2004, 10:53 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap