Posted by Acharya J. Ganesh on August 26, 2004, 6:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
|| Shree Ganesha ||
Dear Friends;
Please check the website chpindia.com and please comment wether it is
done alright this time at least. Last time I got lot of feedback for
ashapurafoods.com saying that the design was not made using strict
dtd. This time I have taken care of using STRICT DTD.
Please Comment, I am a very much new commer with respect to you all.
So. please tell me what more is required.
Best Regards
Ganesh J. Acharya
Webmaster
http://chpindia.com http://ashapurafoods.com http://seashellwebs.coom http://indianbuilders.net http://acs4jobs.com
Posted by jake on August 26, 2004, 7:12 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>|| Shree Ganesha ||
>
>Dear Friends;
>
>Please check the website chpindia.com and please comment wether it is
>done alright this time at least. Last time I got lot of feedback for
>ashapurafoods.com saying that the design was not made using strict
>dtd. This time I have taken care of using STRICT DTD.
But still 6 errors left in the code -- shouldn't take too much effort to
remove them.
>
>Please Comment, I am a very much new commer with respect to you all.
>
>So. please tell me what more is required.
Looking at the first page in Internet Explorer(IE)/Opera/Netscape 7:
>
(1) First -- it's a nice-looking, colourful Web site
(2) Go through each of your <img> tags and ensure that they have the
correct Alternative Text. The text should :
(a) Replicate the text on the image e.g. "C.H. Plastics. The world ..."
(b) Or describe the image
(c) Or set ALT="" if the image contributes nothing to the understanding
(3) Don't use right-justified text in those narrow columns. There's too
much white-space and this makes it difficult to read, especially once
the text is enlarged.
(4) You have some headers: "Finest Finishing" "Facility" "Quality";
these should be marked up in the HTML as headings i.e. <h1><h2><h3><h4>
etc.
(5) You have a linearization error which makes these headers appear out
of sequence in non-visual browsers. Combine each heading with its
following text to cure this.
(6) The text needs to be reviewed. There are too many spelling and
grammar errors in it.
(7) The body text is too small; this should be set to 100% to match the
users' default.
(8) Don't adjust the menu font-weight on hover; this makes the entire
menu jump around.
(9) Although the composite image aligns correctly in IE, it doesn't
quite do so in Netscape or Opera. You might want to consider using a
single image.
(10) The whole page is left-justified, leaving a lot of space on the
right-hand side. It might be better centred.
Posted by Sam Hughes on September 2, 2004, 10:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options
seashell_webs@yahoo.com (Acharya J. Ganesh) wrote in
>|| Shree Ganesha ||
>
> Dear Friends;
>
> Please check the website chpindia.com and please comment wether it is
> done alright this time at least. Last time I got lot of feedback for
> ashapurafoods.com saying that the design was not made using strict
> dtd. This time I have taken care of using STRICT DTD.
I will comment on the design without looking at the HTM code.
1. There is no good reason to splite your images. It merely increases
download time, and in Mozilla 1.7.2, there is a line in the middle of the
image.
2. Visitors don't want to hear that the page was designed by
seashellwebs.com, and I'm sure the client doesn't either, unless he
agreed to your advertising.
3. Here's a good funny:
"This website is best viewed in all known browsers like IE 5.0+ with
screen resolution 800x600."
I see this right after seeing the standards-compliance buttons, which is
ironic, if you don't know. You are vague about "all known browsers" and
you shouldn't specify a screen resolution. Users aren't going to upgrade
(or downgrade) their monitors to 480000 pixels just for this one Web
page. You also are not going to get them to change their browsers. The
message serves no purpose, and it only insults users who lack Internet
Explorer or prefer to use better browsers. Designing to standards
compliance makes such a statement rather silly, because the idea of
standards compliance is that the page works in all browsers which
understand HTML standards.
4. No visitor wants a stats button, so one shouldn't be there. It
certainly shouldn't be animated.
5. Make the text size larger. Text is useless if it can't be read.
Some people do not have 20/20 vision.
Posted by François de Dardel on September 5, 2004, 7:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> seashell_webs@yahoo.com (Acharya J. Ganesh) wrote in
>
>> || Shree Ganesha ||
>>
>> Dear Friends;
>>
>> Please check the website chpindia.com and please comment wether it is
>> done alright this time at least. Last time I got lot of feedback for
>> ashapurafoods.com saying that the design was not made using strict
>> dtd. This time I have taken care of using STRICT DTD.
>
> I will comment on the design without looking at the HTM code.
>
> 1. There is no good reason to splite your images. It merely increases
> download time, and in Mozilla 1.7.2, there is a line in the middle of
> the image.
>
> 2. Visitors don't want to hear that the page was designed by
> seashellwebs.com, and I'm sure the client doesn't either, unless he
> agreed to your advertising.
>
> 3. Here's a good funny:
>
> "This website is best viewed in all known browsers like IE 5.0+ with
> screen resolution 800x600."
>
> I see this right after seeing the standards-compliance buttons, which
> is ironic, if you don't know. You are vague about "all known browsers"
> and you shouldn't specify a screen resolution. Users aren't going to
> upgrade (or downgrade) their monitors to 480000 pixels just for this
> one Web page. You also are not going to get them to change their
> browsers. The message serves no purpose, and it only insults users who
> lack Internet Explorer or prefer to use better browsers. Designing to
> standards compliance makes such a statement rather silly, because the
> idea of standards compliance is that the page works in all browsers
> which understand HTML standards.
>
> 4. No visitor wants a stats button, so one shouldn't be there. It
> certainly shouldn't be animated.
>
> 5. Make the text size larger. Text is useless if it can't be read.
> Some people do not have 20/20 vision.
Sam Hughes is absolutely correct. By the way, the "split image"
horizontal line also appears in my Safari browser. You could use two
pictures, one with your logo and company name, one with your products.
By carefully adjusting the JPEG compression rate, you would get a fair
quality, a faster loading and a more simple HTML.
Additionally, you should check the spelling of your body text (e.g.
"infalatable" and "strintengent").
And finally, you may want to increase the colour contrast between your
pale orange background and your red text.
--
François de Dardel
http:/mapage.noos.fr/dardelf/
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
Enlever le quatorze pour m'écrire
Remove fourteen in the address to send mail
XML Sitemap