HTML Tidy vs. HTML Validator

Posted by VK on March 4, 2006, 8:02 am

Please log in for more thread options

Hi,

After the response on my request from W3C I'm still unclear about Tidy
show/hide quoted text
there is more as I know. Anyway, this very basic HTML page:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN"
show/hide quoted text
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
show/hide quoted text

gives 0 errors / 0 warnings in Tidy. At the same time it tells me "This
page is not Valid -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN!" in W3C HTML
Validator which is totally correct as there is not IFRAME in HTML
Strict. At the same time I understand Tidy's behavior either because no
one need a validator choking in IFRAME - no one would use it then.

Nevertheless Tidy is linked on the w3.org front page and on
show/hide quoted text
endorsement to me.

In my request to W3C I asked to add IFRAME to HTML Strict, but the
response was that HTML DTD's are frozen so everything will stay as it
is.

My question is then: is this Tidy's behavior an illegal adjustment made
by his creators, or it's a W3C informally blessed "loosiness"? If Mr.
Raggett himself could elaborate on this issue it would be great.

Posted by Lars Eighner on March 4, 2006, 8:17 am

Please log in for more thread options

In our last episode,
the lovely and talented VK
broadcast on comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html:

show/hide quoted text

show/hide quoted text

Tidy is a lint and a prettyprinter. It doesn't parse.

show/hide quoted text

show/hide quoted text

show/hide quoted text

Why don't you use loose then? If you have to have IFRAME there are DTDs
that have it, and 4.01 loose is one of them.

show/hide quoted text

It is a good lint and prettyprinter. But it doesn't parse. You can even
add tags to Tidy.

show/hide quoted text

The response should have been: if you add elements like IFRAME to
strict, why not call it loose? There is a DTD with IFRAME. It is called
loose.

show/hide quoted text

--
Lars Eighner usenet@larseighner.com http://www.larseighner.com/
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the
merger of state and corporate power."-Benito Mussolini * When you write the
check to pay your taxes, remember there are two l's in "Halliburton."

Posted by VK on March 4, 2006, 8:57 am

Please log in for more thread options

Lars Eighner wrote:
show/hide quoted text

It does: change from Strict to Frameset or Transitional and different
tags will give you warnings or not. Also the explanation section in
Tidy window is called "HTML Validator". Try to use say "wrap" attribute
in form textarea and you'll get an error - in "HTML Validator" section.
Sorry, but it is much more than a "prettyprinter" may do. It is a
validator - or a program pretending to by such.

show/hide quoted text

My question was not about what to use. My question was about two
different outcomes (valid / invalid) for the very same page using HTML
Tidy and HTML Validator.

If HTML Tidy is not a validator, then it should say nothing about
show/hide quoted text
If it is (besides anything else) a validator, then it should scream
both about wrap and iframe - in HTML Strict.

If it's "mostly validator but just a prettyprinter in some selected
cases" then it should be spelled somewhere - with the list of
exceptions. Does it have sense?

Posted by David Dorward on March 4, 2006, 9:10 am

Please log in for more thread options

VK wrote:
show/hide quoted text

That is what it says - however it doesn't compare the markup to a DTD,
everything is (as far as I know) internalised, and it makes many errors. It
cannot be trusted as a validator.

show/hide quoted text

As Lars said - it is a lint.

show/hide quoted text

Not being a validator doesn't prevent it from performing error checking that
a validator would also do.

show/hide quoted text

The documentation for tidy is misleading. It shouldn't be marked as a
validator, but as an error checking tool (which doesn't cover everything
that a validator would cover).

--
show/hide quoted text
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

Posted by Toby Inkster on March 4, 2006, 9:28 am

Please log in for more thread options

VK wrote:
show/hide quoted text

Lars didn't say it was just a prettyprinter. He said it was a *linter* and
prettyprinter.

A linter does many of the same things that a validator does, though it
will allow some technically invalid things, which the author of the linter
decided were allowable, and may object to some technically valid things
that the author of the linter decided were objectionable.

Another difference between a linter and a validator is that the linter
will attempt to fix the errors it finds, whereas a validator will just
tell you about them.

Tidy is not a validator.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact
Now Playing ~ ./police/every_breath_you_take.ogg