Click here to get back home

Google and the 'www.' subdomain

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 alt.www.webmaster    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Google and the 'www.' subdomain Mark Shroyer 05-01-2008
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by Mark Shroyer on May 1, 2008, 6:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Yesterday's post on Coding Horror got me wondering how Google deals with
the "www." subdomain these days. The prevailing wisdom is that Google
considers www.example.com and example.com as essentially two separate
sites; one should redirect users from www.example.com to example.com, or
vice-versa, so that a site's incoming links will not be split between
the two representations, as that would harm the site's search engine
rank.

But is this still true? I ask because Google's webmaster tools has an
option to set either www.example.com or example.com as a site's
canonical domain for search results. This would seem to imply that
Google now treats the two forms as conceptually the same site (with,
presumably although not necessarily, unified page ranks), at least as
far as search results go.

Any thoughts?

--
Mark Shroyer, http://markshroyer.com/contact/
I have joined others in blocking Google Groups due to excessive
spam. If you want more people to see your posts, you should use
another means of posting on Usenet. http://improve-usenet.org/

Posted by Andrew Heenan on May 1, 2008, 6:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Google's webmaster tools has an
> option to set either www.example.com or example.com as a site's
> canonical domain for search results. This would seem to imply that
> Google now treats the two forms as conceptually the same site (with,
> presumably although not necessarily, unified page ranks), at least as
> far as search results go.

No, it's google recognising that there are (to Google) *potentially* two
entities, and giving you the opportunity to reduce that by 50%.

And it works - but only for Google, of course.

The 301 solution works for any SE that now or ever has that problem.

And it is not always a problem for Google; there are many sites without the
301 that have always existed as either www or non-www; it's only when
someone links to the 'wrong' one, that it comes into existence in the serps.

It even happens to subdomains, if some well-meaning person adds the www in
case you forgot. And, of course similar 'ghosts' appear in forum URLs, and
machine generated pages, where multiple URLs are all possible, but only an
issue if someone uses them.

If Google finds a working link to a working URL, then that URL is added to
the index, if it is not already there.

The fact that Google recognises it and offers a workaround really changes
nothing.

--

Andrew
seo2seo.com
sick-site-syndrome.com

UK Residents:
STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff"
Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the
very poorest tell your friends about this petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/



Similar ThreadsPosted
SEO for subdomain? August 10, 2008, 4:08 pm
path to a subdomain February 9, 2006, 6:34 am
Subdomain Question July 28, 2006, 9:52 pm
.htaccess in subdomain February 27, 2007, 2:12 pm
indexing subdomain October 25, 2007, 4:56 am
How do I create a subdomain from the CLI December 8, 2007, 10:24 pm
robots text and subdomain? February 14, 2005, 6:48 pm
free subdomain @ www.keens.org April 6, 2005, 8:24 am
Seperate log in for webmaster for subdomain August 1, 2007, 11:23 pm
Does subdomain forward with domain? October 4, 2007, 12:08 am

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap