|
Posted by dorayme on April 25, 2008, 2:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
> 62FF4C.14521225042008@web.aioe.org:
>
> >
> >> As much as anyone else should be allowed to point out the failings of
> >> their choices in so choosing.
> >
> > There is an issue in this that has nothing to do with allowing. It is
> > about the appropriateness of bringing out the big guns and blazing away
> > at the mere mention of a small problem with a framed site.
>
> You think not being able to be indexed correctly by the search engines a
> "small problem"?
There are ways to lessen the problem without going to the absolute
extreme of not using frames.
For many small sites, yes, I think it a very small problem. You seem to
think that everyone on this earth who makes a site wants desperately to
be known to all and fast! This is simply not true. Some sites are not
easily found no matter how well done they are, lost in the welter of
noise and guess what, it *does not matter*.
But let me go further. Please, people with weak stomachs or in a
particularly sensitive state caused by frame discussions, do not read on.
There is a whole world of websites that none of you has the least idea
of. I have another organization called "SiteHide" which details a
cultish practice. That of publishing but getting as close to zero
visitors as possible. The aim is to throw Google off. Google is not your
friend in this cult. It is your enemy. "Google is your enemy" is a
phrase that we SiteHiders often use in discussing issues.
The sort of questions that come up on the SiteHide bulletin board often
run along the lines of "Please help, 5 people saw my site today. Where
did I go wrong? How can I at least reduce this number?"
(If any of you are interested, I can send you an application form. There
are some small fees involved)
--
dorayme
| 
XML Sitemap