Click here to get back home

Evaluating CMS software for enterprise

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 alt.www.webmaster    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Evaluating CMS software for enterprise jmc 06-22-2007
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by jmc on June 22, 2007, 7:23 am
Please log in for more thread options


I've the unenviable task of heading up a team at work (scary, huh?) that
is evaluating where we go with our web (which is a shambles just now due
to lack of resources).

In short, one of the decisions to make is what software to go with.
Most of our authors are... not web developers. So, we need to keep it
simple.

Not to get into too much detail, we have less than two dozen page
authors. We have a web server running IIS (don't know what version).
We need something that'll allow page review before posting. We want
control of the look-and-feel, and persistent navigation, but authors
should have control of a navigation system that's within our
look-and-feel (if that makes sense). Ideally we'd want to cater to both
newbies and experienced webmasters. A CMS is probably the best bet -
though I'm willing to listen to dissenting opinions, since I've very
little idea what's out there (for non-CMS options, I'm familiar with
Dreamweaver, FrontPage, and (learning!) NVU).

I'm wondering, what CMS products are out there that we should look at.
Pros and Cons would be good. I know about:

Microsoft Sharepoint (server-based, right?)
Adobe (Macromedia) Contribute (client based?)
Metadot (not a choice, it was dumped due to database corruption issues).

I've used Sharepoint a little bit, and am not enamored of it, but that
may just be because the org that's controlling it has it set up very
restrictively, and nothing like the Microsoft instructions (which makes
it difficult to use).

I know nothing about Contribute except it exists, and I've heard one
non-web-knowledgeable person say it is "easier than Dreamweaver", which
isn't exactly hard to do at that level of knowledge.

I'm sure there's others out there. I don't know if it's better to go
with a server-based or client-based option. I do know the $$ available
to buy and maintain whatever product is chosen is limited (isn't it always?)

I'd also love to hear from folks that have been through something like
this, and can offer advice and help me avoid pitfalls. Doing something
like this is completely new to me...

Thanks for any advice!

jmc

Posted by Alex on June 22, 2007, 10:34 am
Please log in for more thread options



> I've the unenviable task of heading up a team at work (scary, huh?) that
> is evaluating where we go with our web (which is a shambles just now due
> to lack of resources).
>
> In short, one of the decisions to make is what software to go with. Most
> of our authors are... not web developers. So, we need to keep it simple.
>
> Not to get into too much detail, we have less than two dozen page authors.
> We have a web server running IIS (don't know what version). We need
> something that'll allow page review before posting. We want control of the
> look-and-feel, and persistent navigation, but authors should have control
> of a navigation system that's within our look-and-feel (if that makes
> sense). Ideally we'd want to cater to both newbies and experienced
> webmasters. A CMS is probably the best bet - though I'm willing to listen
> to dissenting opinions, since I've very little idea what's out there (for
> non-CMS options, I'm familiar with Dreamweaver, FrontPage, and (learning!)
> NVU).
>
> I'm wondering, what CMS products are out there that we should look at.
> Pros and Cons would be good. I know about:
>
> Microsoft Sharepoint (server-based, right?)
> Adobe (Macromedia) Contribute (client based?)
> Metadot (not a choice, it was dumped due to database corruption issues).
>
> I've used Sharepoint a little bit, and am not enamored of it, but that may
> just be because the org that's controlling it has it set up very
> restrictively, and nothing like the Microsoft instructions (which makes it
> difficult to use).
>
> I know nothing about Contribute except it exists, and I've heard one
> non-web-knowledgeable person say it is "easier than Dreamweaver", which
> isn't exactly hard to do at that level of knowledge.
>
> I'm sure there's others out there. I don't know if it's better to go with
> a server-based or client-based option. I do know the $$ available to buy
> and maintain whatever product is chosen is limited (isn't it always?)
>
> I'd also love to hear from folks that have been through something like
> this, and can offer advice and help me avoid pitfalls. Doing something
> like this is completely new to me...
>
> Thanks for any advice!
>
> jmc

Have you looked at Joomla? (www.joomla.org)




Posted by jmc on June 23, 2007, 1:38 am
Please log in for more thread options


Suddenly, without warning, Alex exclaimed (6/23/2007 12:04 AM):
>> I'm wondering, what CMS products are out there that we should look at.
>> Pros and Cons would be good. I know about:
>>

>
> Have you looked at Joomla? (www.joomla.org)
>
>
>

I have now :)

Thanks!

jmc

Posted by BernardZ on June 24, 2007, 12:48 am
Please log in for more thread options


NOnewsgroupsSPAM@NOjodiBODY.HOMEus says...
> Suddenly, without warning, Alex exclaimed (6/23/2007 12:04 AM):
> >> I'm wondering, what CMS products are out there that we should look at.
> >> Pros and Cons would be good. I know about:
> >>
>
> >
> > Have you looked at Joomla? (www.joomla.org)
> >
> >
> >
>
> I have now :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> jmc
>


Joomla gives you a growth path too.

The main problem, I have with it is that I don't think it looks so
professional. The more I use it, the less I use it if that sort of makes
sense.


Posted by Matt Probert on June 22, 2007, 11:29 am
Please log in for more thread options


On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:53:27 +0930, jmc

>In short, one of the decisions to make is what software to go with.
>Most of our authors are... not web developers. So, we need to keep it
>simple.

ALL technical authors should be perfectly capable of picking up HTML
within a few days, heck they can use DTP can't they?

Matt


--
The Probert Encyclopaedia

Reliable, accountable, data for serious researchers

Understandable and usable information for students

http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com


Similar ThreadsPosted
Evaluating websites using Bayesian filter April 27, 2006, 11:07 pm
How do you thing about Symantec Antivirus for enterprise? October 31, 2006, 8:47 pm
But after evaluating the situation, he is not that (not just a cyber psycho stalker) March 6, 2006, 2:39 pm
Exporting/Importing data with SQL Server Enterprise Manager October 12, 2005, 3:25 pm
Enterprise Mobile Messaging Current Scenario and Future Trends July 16, 2008, 7:25 am
Affordable Email Marketing Software and Newsletter Software for All Needs October 18, 2007, 3:32 am
Free Web Based Help Desk Software, Help Desk Solution And Customer Support Software December 21, 2007, 10:23 pm
Free Web Based Help Desk Software, Help Desk Solution And Customer Support Software December 21, 2007, 10:43 pm
Best SEO Software July 2, 2005, 2:18 am
Design software? January 14, 2005, 5:53 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap