|
Posted by Peter J Ross on September 4, 2008, 3:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html on Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:01:09
> I've seen this page, that seems invalid to me. Doctype is incomplete
That's unusual, but the result seems to be that the validator treats
it as "strict".
> and it does not have a <body> tag.
<body> can be implied, not specified, in HTML. HTML is a subset of
SGML, not XML.
> However, W3C validator validates it
> as HTML 4.01 strict, even when I force the DOCTYPE. I think it should
> be a bug in the validator, but perhaps, I missed something. What do
> you think?
I think it's nice to see an 18-year-old sharing his photos somewhere
other than crap sites like myspace or facebook.
I think it's also nice that the W3C validator takes "strict" as its
default.
The site would benefit from abandoning tables for layout, of course.
> Page:
> http://www.bcc.ufla.br/~lpgomes/
>
> Validator:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bcc.ufla.br%2F~lpgomes%2F
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
| 
