|
Posted by Grant Schenck on October 26, 2006, 3:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options Sorry, I hadn't realized it was a data call.
Bottom line it sure sounds like an issue in your 8500's TSP.
--
Grant Schenck
http://grantschenck.tripod.com/
> Hi All/Grant,
> re-reading my posts I probably wasn't very clear. Here's what I see
> happening....
>
> - Make a call from an 8500 to an 8310.
> - The 8500 receives a connect message within a reasonable amount of
> time.
> - The 8310 does not receive a connect message.
> - Hang up on the 8500. The 8310 now receives the connect message.
>
> I can make calls from the 8310 to the 8500 and from one 8310 to another
> 8310 without any issue (i.e. both phones receive the connect in a
> timely fashion, start tx/rx and receive data on both phones).
>
> It's a strange problem. Why would disconnecting on the 8500 suddenly
> cause the connect to appear on the 8310?
>
> Thanks,
> Ralph
>
>
> ralphdepp...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Grant Schenck wrote:
>> > Does the audio actually connect at the same time? Is it only the TAPI
>> > call
>> > state event which is delayed?
>> >
>>
>> I am waiting for the connect message before starting communications
>> (using a serial interface to the modem to transfer data). So the first
>> phone (which receives the connect in a timely fashion) begins
>> transmitting and receiving. As the connect wasn't received at the
>> other end I don't being transmitting or receiving at that end (so I
>> haven't verified if the line is actually open). So I can try and have
>> both sides tx/rx from an earlier point and see if the line is up, even
>> though I don't receive the connect on one end. What do you think?
>>
>> > Is it the same phone in the interaction (i.e., the calling phone or the
>> > called phone) which exhibit the problems or is it random?
>> >
>>
>> I tried to detail the phone interaction in my original post. Basically
>> it is only a problem for the QTEK 8500 making a call. When receiving a
>> call it is fine.
>>
>> > Bottom line is that if the problem is the delayed event then ultimately
>> > this
>> > has to be a problem either in the actual connection detection in the
>> > scenario you describe or a bug in the TAPI Service Provider (TSP) where
>> > somehow it gets confused. Given that your only option may be to work
>> > directly with the vendor who provided the hardware/TSP.
>>
>> Thanks for your time and help. It may be that we need to talk to QTEK.
>> There are well publicised issues with the 8500 (with a new ROM image
>> in the pipe works) and it may be that we're coming up against a problem
>> at that end. However we're assuming at the moment the problem is
>> elsewhere (i.e. one that we may have introduced....although it seems to
>> be strongly phone/scenario dependent)
>> > --
>> > Grant Schenck
>> > http://grantschenck.tripod.com/
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > > when making a data call between 2 mobile phones one of the phones
>> > > receives the LINECALLSTATE_CONNECTED before the other phone. We've
>> > > seen two distinct cases:
>> > >
>> > > 1.) There is about a 12 second delay between receiving the connect on
>> > > one phone and then the other.
>> > > 2.) The first phone receives the connect and the second phone doesn't
>> > > receive the connect. When you hang up on the first phone the second
>> > > phone then receives the connect.
>> > >
>> > > What, in general, could cause this behaviour?
>> > >
>> > > Here is the setup:
>> > >
>> > > Developing on Windows Mobile 5.0 with a couple of Qtek phones - 8500
>> > > and 8310. Using a GSM data channel (CSD) to make a data connection
>> > > between two mobile phones.
>> > >
>> > > - When making the call between two 8310 phones there are no problems,
>> > > the connect is received at both ends at roughly the same time.
>> > >
>> > > - When making a call from the 8310->8500 we have no problems, the
>> > > connect is received at both ends at roughly the same time.
>> > >
>> > > - When making a call from the 8500->8310 we see the problems as
>> > > detailed in 1.) and 2.) above.
>> > >
>> > > If there are further details that I should provide please let me
>> > > know,
>> > > Ralph
>> > >
>
|