|
Posted by Peter Scott on July 20, 2007, 8:40 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:58:21 +0200, Jim Cochrane wrote:
> I just did a quick google search of the perl groups and was not able to
> locate any relevant information: I'm trying to find out if there is any
> kind of informal method available to gain confidence that a particular
> CPAN module is reliable. I know there is no formal process, but it
> seems to me that good, stable, reliable modules will have earned a good
> reputation and that this reputation will be visible somehow on the
> internet. But I've not been able to find any "reliable" way of doing
> this check. When I come across a CPAN module that's not part of the
> standard Perl release, it's often very hard to tell if the module is any
> good.
The modules in thus list should be reliable:
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/100/
--
Peter Scott
http://www.perlmedic.com/
http://www.perldebugged.com/
| 
XML Sitemap