|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on December 15, 2008, 2:19 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Dec 15, 6:00=A0pm, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:
> I have a client (product development, not website development)
> who has a low volume site (a hundred hits a day on a single
> static 64K HTML page) but who needs maximum reliability and
> minimum downtime.
>
> Who has the most reliable hosting service? =A0I am looking for
> a provider with multiple data centers in different locations
> and a monitoring system that will switch over the site if a
> hurricane or earthquake hits one of the data centers.
>
> Yes, I am aware of redundant DNS -- that's how I got involved
> in this discussion with the client in the first place -- but
> I also know that you should start with the most reliable hosting
> service you can find before rolling your own DNS fallback scheme.
>
> Cost is not important. =A0He does use .htaccess but nothing else
> -- no php, no ssl, no https, just a plain vanilla website.
> He prefers a dedicated IP address, not shared hosting, Apache,
> not IIS, and BSD or Linux with a slight preference for BSD,
> not Windows.
>
> Suggestions?
>
Take a look at ServerGrade.
http://www.servergrade.com.au/faq/answers/uptime-proof.html
They have servers in the U.S as well as Australia.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.net
| 
XML Sitemap
