|
Posted by Manny BorgesøƧŸ h®¬v+ ºË"¢{& on August 1, 2005, 7:53 am
Please log in for more thread options Hi Hank,
I agree 100 percent. SAV works and it has great rollout tools. If it isn't
broken, don't fix it, eh?
SAV may take system resources, but so does everything. Hank was right on
target. How much is your time worth? Do you want to discard the money you
have already spent on SAV?
"Hank Arnold" wrote:
> Symantec SAV should work just fine. It sounds like you are already running
> it. There are others out there that *may* run better with less demand on the
> resources, but SAV is a solid product that works.
>
> One factor to consider here is the cost of migrating. It will cost big bucks
> (and time) for what could be a small benefit....
>
> I would stay with what you have unless there are specific reasons to
> change...
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hank Arnold
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have a Microsoft 2003 Server with active directory enabled and 3
> > workstations ( Windows XP and 2000 pro )
> >
> > I would like know which is the most antivirus system.
> >
> > However, I use actually symantec SAV Server and client.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Guillaume LECOMTE
> > Tel +33 6 20 05 06 27
> > Fax : +33 8 25 17 10 86
> >
> >
>
>
>
| 
XML Sitemap