|
Posted by Philip Herlihy on August 23, 2005, 1:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options They turn out to be the same product - looks very promising. I'm trying to
clarify whether there is a licensing/pricing differential - if there is,
I'll post back. Otherwise, this looks like the answer. Thanks again!
--
####################
## PH, London
####################
> Thanks, Keith, Giuseppe - I'll look into both of these!
>
> --
> ####################
> ## PH, London
> ####################
>> Philip Herlihy wrote:
>>> I have legitimate licensed copies of Windows 2000 Server and Windows
>>> 2003 Server. I've no real need to run them, but thought I might
>>> dedicate one of my machines to a server version of Windows mainly to
>>> get more familiarity with them.
>>>
>>> However, I've found a lot of software I'd want to install expects some
>>> fantastically expensive "server" license, which makes some uses
>>> prohibitively expensive.
>>>
>>> One sticking point is Antivirus software. I have licensed copies of
>>> Norton AV 2004 for desktop and laptop PCs, and I have both AVG and
>>> Avast (free) running on machines which are genuinely "home" machines.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if there's an Antivirus which I can run on a "server"
>>> without costing a bomb?
>>
>> Try eTrust by CA.
>> It is possible to download a trial version. It is very cheap.
>> --
>> ---
>> Giuseppe Nacci
>> Microsoft Certified System Engineer
>> Microsoft Certified Trainer
>> Security Manager
>>
>>
>>
>
>
| 
XML Sitemap